High Court Kerala High Court

C.A.Jamal vs Jordy Tariyan on 3 October, 2008

Kerala High Court
C.A.Jamal vs Jordy Tariyan on 3 October, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

RCRev..No. 244 of 2008()


1. C.A.JAMAL, S/O.ABDUL KADER,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. JORDY TARIYAN, S/O.U.J.TARIYAN,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.R.RAMADAS

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMAN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :03/10/2008

 O R D E R
                           P.R.RAMAN &
                 T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,JJ.
             -------------------------------
                    R.C.R.NO.244 OF 2008
             --------------------------------
               Dated this the 3rd day of October, 2008

                            O R D E R

Raman,J.

Revision Petitioner is the tenant, who faced with an order of

eviction passed by the Rent Control Court and affirmed by the

Appellate Authority. The landlord sought eviction under Section

11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. The

need put forward by the landlord is to conduct a Readymade

Garment business. The need as put forward by the landlord was

found to be bona fide. Though the tenant claimed the benefit of the

proviso, the court below found that the benefit of the proviso is not

substantiated by adducing satisfactory evidence. The burden being

on the tenant to prove the same and on failure to do so, the court

below rejected the contention and ordered eviction. The Appellate

Authority after re-appreciation of the evidence on record,

confirmed the view as expressed by the Rent Control Court. In such

-2-
R.C.R.No.244/2008

circumstances, the tenant has preferred this revision petition.

2. The learned counsel Sri R. Ramadas appearing on behalf of

the revision petitioner after arguing for sometime and on finding

that this Court is not likely to accept his contentions as raised

sought to withdraw the same. However he pleaded for larger time

to give vacant possession of the tenanted premises. Accordingly,

we dismiss this revision petition. However, the tenant is given six

months’ time to surrender vacant possession of the tenanted

premises on the following conditions:

1) The petitioner herein shall give an undertaking in

the form of an affidavit before the execution court

within a period of one month from today that he

will surrender vacant possession of the premises on

or before 3-4-2009 and also remit the entire arrears

of rent if any, within the aforesaid period.

2) He shall continue to pay the amount equivalent to

the rent for use and occupation, until the vacant

possession is surrendered.

3) He shall not induct any third parties to the tenanted

-3-
R.C.R.No.244/2008

premises.

4) In case of failure to comply with any of the above

conditions, the order of eviction passed by the court

below will become enforceable forthwith.

Otherwise it will stand deferred for a period of six

months.

P.R.RAMAN,
Judge.

T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,
Judge.

kcv.

-4-
R.C.R.No.244/2008