C.Anil Kumar vs State Of Kerala Represented By Its on 21 January, 2008

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 245 of 2008(D)


1. C.ANIL KUMAR, PROVISIONAL CONDUCTOR,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS
                       ...       Respondent

2. KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.SHRIHARI RAO

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :21/01/2008

 O R D E R
                             S.SIRI JAGAN, J.

                          =======================

                            W.P.(C) No. 245  of 2008(D)

                          =======================


                    Dated this the  21st  day of January, 2008




                                 JUDGMENT

The petitioner who is stated to have been working as a

provisional conductor in the 2nd respondent Corporation from

1999 onwards, claims to regularisation in service as in the case

of certain other similarly placed provisional conductors. Raising

this claim, petitioner has filed Ext.P3 representation before the

1st respondent. The petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of the

same.

2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader and the

standing counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent. In the facts

and circumstances of the case, there would be a direction to the

1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on

Ext.P3, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three

months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment after

affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner as well

as 2nd respondent. However, I make it clear that I have not

W.P.(C) No. 245/2008/D -2-

considered the claim of the petitioner on merits and it would be

for the 1st respondent to decide the question on the basis of the

law prevailing on the subject.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

S.SIRI JAGAN,

JUDGE

jp