High Court Kerala High Court

C.B.Sureshkumar vs The Regional Transport Authority on 14 October, 2010

Kerala High Court
C.B.Sureshkumar vs The Regional Transport Authority on 14 October, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 28789 of 2009(P)


1. C.B.SURESHKUMAR, CHILANGALIYATH HOUSE
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KANNUR
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT

3. E.R.GOPALAKRISHNAN, ELATHUPARAMBA

                For Petitioner  :SRI.I.DINESH MENON

                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :14/10/2010

 O R D E R
                 T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J.
                   -------------------------------------
                   W.P.(C)No.28789 Of 2009
             -----------------------------------------------------
       DATED THIS THE 14th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2010

                              J U D G M E N T

The main prayer in the Writ Petition is for a direction to the

Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Kannur not to grant

further temporary permit on the route Kasaragod-Guruvayur as

Limited Stop Fast Passenger service in respect of stage carriage

KL-8B 2094. It is owned by the 2nd respondent. According to the

petitioner the vehicles has attained 5 years of age on 13.8.2009

and the same has not been replaced.

2. On behalf of the 2nd respondent, a counter affidavit has

been filed. It is pointed out that the vehicle was registered on

12.8.2004 and had completed five years on 11.8.2009 and after

11.8.2009, no temporary permit under Section 87(1)(d) was

issued to the vehicle and it is not conducting service. Now the

vehicle is under stoppage. The permit holder requested time for

replacing the vehicle by a later model vehicle. It is pointed out

that the timing conference fixed on 16.10.2009 was for the

variation and the same was postponed also. Further, it is pointed

out that the renewal of permit is for want of confirmation from

W.P.(C)No. 28789/09 -2-

sister RTAs under Section 87(1)9d) before attaining the age of

five years and no temporary permit under Section 87(1)9d) was

issued after the expiry of five years. In the light of the above

position, no further orders are called for in the Writ Petition and

the Writ Petition is hence disposed of in the light of the

averments in the counter affidavit filed by the 2nd respondent. No

costs.

T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.

dsn