High Court Kerala High Court

C.D.Chacko vs Regional Transport Authority on 18 August, 2008

Kerala High Court
C.D.Chacko vs Regional Transport Authority on 18 August, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 15586 of 2007(E)


1. C.D.CHACKO, S/O.DEVASSIA,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,
                       ...       Respondent

2. SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT

                For Petitioner  :SRI.G.HARIHARAN

                For Respondent  :SRI.P.GOPALAKRISHNA MENON

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :18/08/2008

 O R D E R
                      ANTONY DOMINIC, J

     -----------------------------------------------------------
          W.P.(C).Nos.3343/08,3358/08,3403/2008 &
                            15586/2007
     -----------------------------------------------------------
           Dated this the 18th     day of August, 2008


                            JUDGMENT

In the first three writ petitions ,what is under challenge

is Ext.P2 produced in WP(c).No.3403/2008, a common order

passed by the Secretary, RTA, revising the timings of the 3rd

respondent, which is common in the aforesaid three cases.

Against the said order of the Secretary, revision petitions

filed were rejected by Ext.P17 order produced in WP(c).

No.3403/2008. It is challenging the aforesaid two orders,

the aforesaid three writ petitions have been filed by the

petitioners herein.

2 WP(c).No.15586/2007 is filed by the 3rd respondent

in the aforesaid three cases challenging Ext.P7 therein,

modifying Ext.P2 order referred above.

WP(c).No.3403/2008 & Ors. 2

3. When the matter came up for orders, even the 3rd

respondent agrees that the aforesaid orders were issued

without due advertence to the relevant considerations and

agrees that the matter needs to be reconsidered.

4. In view of the unanimity among all the contesting

parties, I dispose of the aforesaid three writ petitions

setting aside the impugned orders Exts.P2 and P17 in WP

(C).No.3403/2008, which are also impugned in WP(c).

Nos.3343/2008 & 3358/2008.

5. For the same reason, Ext.P7 order challenged in WP

(c).No.15586/2007 also is set aside.

The matter shall stand remitted to the Secretary, RTA

for fresh consideration with notice to the parties. The RTA

shall consider the matter afresh and pass orders, as

expeditiously as possible and at any rate within 8 weeks

from the date of production of a copy of the judgment.

ANTONY DOMINIC
JUDGE

vi.

WP(c).No.3403/2008 & Ors. 3