High Court Kerala High Court

C.G. Shajimon Alias Shaji vs State Of Kerala on 2 July, 2008

Kerala High Court
C.G. Shajimon Alias Shaji vs State Of Kerala on 2 July, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 4104 of 2008()


1. C.G. SHAJIMON ALIAS SHAJI,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.G.ARUN

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA

 Dated :02/07/2008

 O R D E R
                              K.HEMA, J.

                  -----------------------------------------
                        B.A.No. 4104 of 2008
                  -----------------------------------------

                   Dated this the 2nd July, 2008

                               O R D E R

This petition is for anticipatory bail.

2. The alleged offences are under Sections 120(B), 468, 471,

419, 420 and 34 of Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is the first

accused. He is a licensee of foreign liquor shop during the period

1998-1999. He forged certain documents and produced the same

before the Sales-tax authorities with the help of a Village Assistant

and the second accused. A complaint was filed before the

Government by the Sales-tax authorities and thereafter an enquiry

was conducted by the Vigilance and a crime is registered against

the petitioner and two others. Crime is now being investigated into

by the local police.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the petitioner

is innocent of the allegations made. According to him, custodial

interrogation of the petitioner is not necessary since the

investigation is completed.

4. This petition is strongly opposed. It is submitted by

learned Public Prosecutor that the charge sheet has not been laid

BA.4104/08 2

and the involvement of the second and third accused has to be

clearly found out. According to him, another accused is also

involved in the crime and the details of the said person have to be

ascertained. If the petitioner is released on bail, it may not be

possible to trace out those details, it is submitted.

5. On hearing both sides, I am satisfied that granting of

anticipatory bail to the petitioner will adversely affect the

investigation and hence this petition is dismissed.

K.HEMA, JUDGE

vgs.