High Court Kerala High Court

C.J.Marikutty vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 12 January, 2010

Kerala High Court
C.J.Marikutty vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 12 January, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 930 of 2010(M)


1. C.J.MARIKUTTY, CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,

3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.R.RAJESH

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.SURENDRA MOHAN

 Dated :12/01/2010

 O R D E R
                         K. SURENDRA MOHAN, J.
               ------------------------------------------------------------
                         W.P(C) NO: 930 OF 2010
                -----------------------------------------------------------
                 Dated this the 12th January, 2010.

                                    JUDGMENT

The petitioner is a retired Circle Inspector of Police (woman).

She entered service as a Police Constable and was promoted as a

Sub Inspector of Police and thereafter as Circle Inspector of Police.

According to the petitioner, one B. Omana had retired from service

as the Deputy Superintendent of Police (woman), Womens Cell,

Thiruvananthapuram on 31.1.2007. The petitioner being the next

seniormost person should have been promoted and posted to the

said retirement vacancy. However, no steps were taken to promote

the petitioner or to post her. Therefore, she retired on 30.9.2008

without getting the promotion. After her retirement it is her case

that another person was immediately posted to the said vacancy.

Therefore, she claims retrospective promotion with effect from

1.2.2007 and also claims all consequential monetary benefits.

2. The petitioner has submitted Ext.P5 representation to the

first respondent, on which no final orders have been passed yet. In

view of the above, this writ petition can be disposed of directing the

first respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5

representation as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a

WPC 930/2010 2

period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this

judgment.

K.SURENDRA MOHAN, Judge

jj.