High Court Karnataka High Court

C K Baljee vs Harsh Baljee on 14 December, 2010

Karnataka High Court
C K Baljee vs Harsh Baljee on 14 December, 2010
Author: Anand Byrareddy
IN THE I"I}GI~'I COURT OF KARNATAIQX AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 14m DAY 039' DECEMBER 2010 
BEFORE V
THE HONBLE MRJUSTICE ANAND  

MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL No;'14

303 0L2ef1_"t) V   n

T.O.S.NOE.OF 2009s.'

Between:

C.K. Baljee,

Son of Late C. Baijee,
Aged about 59 years,
Residing at N0.12,4.,

Defence Colony} 3j:j<1.e-Main,  

Indi1*anaga1g-  "  » -.
Bangaiore. _ "

[By Just Laxin A(}:«_rQ'cafe._s)"" 
    z   ..... 

    
~ ' -.SorV1'(if-1ate'C.Ba1jee.

A  Sincgte _Ci'j{:(ieased,
'Repijesented by

Igegal representatives,

Z

.. Applicant



1(a)

Respondents 1{a) to ((2)

("LP

Renu Baljee
Wife of Late Harsh Baljee.
Aged about 57 years,

N amita Gandhi
Daughter of Harsh Baljee.

Sumita Lamba

Daughter of Harsh Balj eeja.   .

Aged about 34 years,

Ba1jee's Restaurant,  .
No.26, The Mall.4Shim1a'.'"  * . 

2.

Man] u    ' C

Wife of Naféla    V' C

Aged..abo'utl 5§3;_yea.rs;.. C

ReVsiding"at.VNo'.3,16000:," _ 

Brehon  
Brookuesfieldf   
WI, USA{ . A " u 

residing  ;

.. Respondents

 UdayaA';E"fo11a..vSenior Counsel for Respondent
 1'(;.--'\..~3C}, Respondent No.2 Served)

  Civil Application filed under

Seo'tio"n l5llVo_f Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, praying to
modify the order' dated 09.09.2009 and direct. the

 ' 'Registry. totrefund the full court fees paid in the matter.

l"i'.his Miscellaneous Civil oomirlg on for Orders this

  the Court made the following: '

%



ORDER

The present application is filed to state thatrithe

testamentary suit was filed seeking grant of _

the will of one late Baljee, in favotiif of t1’1e’v*p:etitioneVr. it

During the pendeney of the petietiorigthe’=1fr1atter’Via:as:i;_*’

compromised and it was agree_d—that ipro’batei.:he.i._grantedh

in favour of the petitioner and_..aeeording1’y,” «wtamsppvvcfiecreed
and this Court had direeted. per cent of the
court fee to the_:pe_titior1Wer.’ ::V;The..V:’Vpreserif’application is

filed tofgstate,’ of the Division Bench

decision vs. SOUTH INDIAN BANK

MAI;LESI:fV§Z:f&RAM BRANCH, BANGALORE &

V”–..AAi\:?.OTHER~i;’;teported in 2007(1) Kar.L.J. 57. the

pet.it.i”onerA to refund of the full. court fees paid

‘and an appropriate modification of the earlier

A “:ioi”A(ieir”~«_.a1id decree, to refund the full court fees paid.

é»

Learned counsel for the lesponcleni; has no 0bjeCi.iefi’L'<.t.d.A'

the application being aliowed. Aee0rding1y;'.. {fhe-.«i§/iiéei'A'

CV1. 14303/2010 is allowed. The""03"fiee u

refund the full court fees paid to * . ~. V'