High Court Kerala High Court

C.K. Hamza vs State Of Kerala Represented By on 13 November, 2008

Kerala High Court
C.K. Hamza vs State Of Kerala Represented By on 13 November, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.MC.No. 4240 of 2008()


1. C.K. HAMZA, S/O.KUNHUMUHAMMED
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.KISHOR B.

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :13/11/2008

 O R D E R
                          R.BASANT, J.
                       ----------------------
                     Crl.M.C.No.4240 of 2008
                   ----------------------------------------
           Dated this the 13th day of November 2008

                              O R D E R

Petitioner’s vehicle was allegedly used for the commission

of an offence punishable under ‘The Kerala Protection of River

Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act. The petitioner

applied for release of the vehicle. The learned Magistrate, by

the impugned order, rejected the same on the ground that the

vehicle was earlier involved in a similar incident.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

the allegations are not correct. On both occasions, the vehicle

was not so used. In appropriate proceedings, the petitioner shall

be able to establish that his vehicle was not so involved. But at

any rate, the vehicle may not be permitted to be exposed to sun

and rain and suffer any avoidable damage and deterioration.

Subject to any appropriate conditions the vehicle may be ordered

to be released to the petitioner, it is prayed.

3. Notice was given to the learned Public Prosecutor.

The learned Public Prosecutor submits that the State has no

objection against release of the vehicle subject to appropriate

conditions as are normally imposed by this court in respect of

Crl.M.C.No.4240/08 2

vehicles which are allegedly involved in a second occasion for

such violation.

4. I am satisfied that the vehicle can be directed to be

released. In coming to the conclusion, the concerns which were

adverted to by the Supreme Court in Sunderbhai Ambalal

Desai v. State of Gujarat [SC 2003(2) KLT 1089] do weigh

with me.


      5.    In the result,

      a)    This petition is allowed.

      b)    It is directed that the vehicle, Mini Lorry No. KL-6

5229 shall be released to the petitioner on the following terms

and conditions.

i) The petitioner shall produce before the learned

Magistrate all documents to show that he is the person entitled

to possession of the vehicle.

ii) He shall execute a bond for an amount equal to the

value of the vehicle as may be determined by the learned

Magistrate with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the

satisfaction of the learned Magistrate.

Crl.M.C.No.4240/08 3

iii) The petitioner shall deposit an amount of Rs.50,000/-

(Rupees fifty thousand only) as cash security before the court

below.

iv) The petitioner shall, in the bond to be executed by

him, undertake that the vehicle shall not be used or permitted to

be used by him under the ‘The Kerala Protection of River Banks

and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act’ for commission of any

offence while it is in his possession on the strength of this order.

6. If the petitioner complies with the conditions, release

order shall be issued by the learned Magistrate and thereupon

the vehicle in whosesoever custody it is, shall be released to the

petitioner forthwith.

Hand over copy of this order to the learned counsel for the

petitioner.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)
jsr

Crl.M.C.No.4240/08 4

Crl.M.C.No.4240/08 5

R.BASANT, J.

CRL.M.C.No. of 2008

ORDER

09/07/2008