High Court Karnataka High Court

C K Madhukar vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 December, 2009

Karnataka High Court
C K Madhukar vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 December, 2009
Author: H N Das
 HG:

 BANGALORE-560040

N'Ivl

IN THE HIGH CGURT or KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE?"»G

DATED THIS THE: 16'1"" DAY OF DECEMBER  G:  ''

BEFO RE

THE HGN'I31,1: Mr. JUSTiCE 1--1.N.:§§1AG"AMG«HAIx3.tjA:;  I

WRIT P1+:T1T1oN No.3623/2dGs(L--B-BMT5;--v_,f- = " "

BETWEEN:

1 c KMADHUKAR      
S /O LATE c R_KRISHN--A,_MURIHY   '- "
AGED ABO.U"'F_66 YEARS -  - 

2 SMT POORNTMA'?MA;GH.m56_QQG3

 " ~ RASV_E1i\;'l?I..EV£ADHUKAR
.;-£3/' K MALDHUKAR
-A 'AGED Ma YEARS
-R/AT N_'()_',; ?75. 5TH MAIN
VIJAYAHAGAR

... PETITION ERS

..j;_.{I3_«; S148 G.12%;:131L11:> KUMAR FOR M/S RAG es: ASSOCIATES}

dvxzx,



!\J

AND:

1 '1'!-"IES'I'A'l'E OFIG-\R1\EA'{'AI{A
BY" ms SECRE'I'ARY  
URBAN DEVELOPMENT 13131->AR'1'§\/EENT H  " ' 
M.S.BUlLD1NG  * '
DRAMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BANG-A.I,ORE»»56000 1

REPBY yrs c0MM1ss10NE:R_ 
N R SQUARE 
B1~\NGALOREw56OOG2~.__

2 BRuw\'1.' BANGALORE MA1?m..NAGA:72A 

3 THE ASSISTANT EXEC L3'rIv-Ew'I3NG'1
HEBBAL sUB.D1V1s101\:_:-». ' '  --~'
B.B.E\/LP.   

4 13ANGAI;;0 RE V Ni 1«:I'£jR0.§»fQ 1:1.' {AN "REGION
I)EVEI;OI?Nivl?;NT Am*Hc>]Rn*Y'

  
L3A:\IGA1,O'R1%:m56'0052  . _
REP; £3'? ITS CC;-~MM;S;~3.10N1«:R
" "      RESPONDENTS

{BY SR!R.DI-EVDASSVJCAOCA  R1
SP3; 8 N PRAS[*EANTl~I,CHANDRA' ADV FOR R2 81 R3

'C "  { s}21's;.G.13AND1*r, 'A'I')V FOR R4]

  _C_":*1r1IS4..\C,:a;z;*éii'z::I{E;1'1T10N IS. FILED UNDER ARTICLIES 226
AND "227 0£+=_...jr£~;;1: CONSTITUTION 01> INDIA. PRAYING TO
IHCCLARE .T'}"i;r-'{I'O THE AMICNDMIZEWI" ACT AT ANNEXUREME

 .VIZ.. '4"i"'.!~{1£f K}';RN1\'l'AKA TOVVN AND COUNTRY' PL;-'--\NNING
 AND C££R'I';AEN OTHER LAVV {AMENDMENT} ACT, 2004.
 "{KA~RNE_A'I'A}(A ACT NO}/2007}. DT 6.2.07 II\ISP3R'I'lNG
  SEC'I'ION 276FF TO THE' MAIN ACT OF 196} AND
TINS_ER"i"ING SECTION 321--A TO THE KARNATAKA
 ___"1\'/IU1¥lCIPAL CORPORATION ACT. 1976 AND INSERTING
 'S..¥:IC'l'ION 187A TO THE KARNATAKA 1\/IUNCIPALI'I'lES ACT <

6% \a\;'\.»



 ,CEm* ~  

{,0

1964 AS UNCONSTlTU'1'1ONAL BISENG ULTRA ViRES AND
VOID IN SO FAR AS PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED. '

THIS WRIT PETi'I'1ON COMING ON FOR orzpyiirzs;_~*1ii«§é1i:;:_

DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:--

ORDER

Learned Counsel for theV;3§;§1’EV§’io11e19shas VIi~1<-:&'.._Vz11""m:';¥111o
seeking withdrawal of the__\v1'it: pe.1..it'._1f0n."r._Thr: 1fi'<:n)p piaced

on record.

Acc:o1’c1i11gl:y.”‘1.h _’e Wifii :p=3{itiC.x1.”iS–hgfézby dismissed as

wEti}1draw;1’.A””‘ -. V’