C M Madhu vs Shoukath Ali on 30 January, 2009

I

IN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA AT BANGA!f_) R_tf1'

DATED 'E'HiS THE} 30m DAY OF' JANEEARY.-250?.' ; j--i    .

BEFORE V

THE HON'BLF. MR. wsrlcfgn A-.s A.B($r3;iN'fiA'  ; T T

MISCELL=ANF.OUS FIRST AWEAI,'NQ;"341;2{*:{:s§'_(M\f; 
BETWEEN:  V'    1

CMMADHU   _  

szo av. MALL1KARJUNA;"m3ED.AI3=c:UT--1:'.. % 

YEARS, smngm, MINOR, REP"I'D'B'f ms * .  

FATHER NAWRALVGuaaxavzazsycv-MAL1.1KAR;H5~NA

AGED ABOUT 3f2°¥1;ARs,;;R /Q QHIKKA'ij'HAN<§}ALI

'WLIAGE, TANC}ALi;PQS'}f, 'KA$ABA'_P%OB5.!' * 

KADUR TAIJJK, 'c:Hm~:_AMA_g3AL1_3R-- DIST'  '  APPELLANI'

{By Sri:_.S--P.  PATIL, ADVs}
AND: V' V ' é V' 'V 
1 sH0UKATH';m".é/Q.i;ADA1=-EER
AGED i'xBOUT 1 I EKR3, OCC;DK'IVE§.'

; Rf!) JANAKALLU, HOSADURGA TALUK
 _'<.CEHI'FE?§ADURL}A----D£8T

 '  "  E,V'vARi::H_AMAN 8/0 E VAJRAPPA

 J0CG;B:I31V:9Ess, OWNER OF BUS
 '-.'ATfP"_C}._H'{DSADURGA
 QHETRADURGA DIST

 3  NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD

..  BRANCH 095103
'QCHITRABURGA, BY ITS MANAGER  RESPONDENTS

‘ “:33? Sri: M U Pooi~1AC.HA,A£:-V. FOR R3)

1?

4

was aged f4 years: and even though amount ttnvauigi.

fiitum earning capacity cannravt he gmntrzd, _

discomfort. that Wnuhi he aufii-sited in View _nf–

another sum of Rs. 10,000 /- ttrwnfds jjfif

be awarded. Themfom, the.cI§ai1n:-ffietf’ap{:efl§:fi-E’iifirtitakfg be A ,

entifleti tn the enhanced — with
intnarest at 6% 11.3. ‘ the data
of payment, in V ahteady
awarded hy g portion of the
by the 3″‘
\:vithin a period of six
Weeks thi=. :9? bf a copy nsf this crmiesr. On
such be disbursed tn the clairnant.

tE*:e..a1mve, the appeal stands diszposed of

‘w.if}’a= “fies vdniér to costs.

Sd/4,.

Judge

.’ fefii[‘I§ms