High Court Kerala High Court

C.P.Davi vs The Inspecting Assistant … on 2 February, 2009

Kerala High Court
C.P.Davi vs The Inspecting Assistant … on 2 February, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 3395 of 2009(D)


1. C.P.DAVI, S/O.PAPPACHAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :02/02/2009

 O R D E R
                    ANTONY DOMINIC,J.
              -----------------------
                W.P.(C).No.3395 OF 2009
              ------------------------
          Dated this the 2nd day of February, 2009.

                          JUDGMENT

Petitioner submits that the 2nd respondent registered

a case against him under Section 17 of the Kerala Money

Lenders Act, as Crime No.820/08 of Kunnamkulam Police

Station. It is stated that immediately thereafter he filed

Ext.P1 application before the first respondent for

compounding the said office. The application so made is

pending before the first respondent and in the meantime

the 2nd respondent is continuing the investigation in the

crime mentioned above.

2. In this writ petition, petitioner submits that the first

respondent may be directed to pass orders on Ext.P1

application filed under Section 18E of the Act for

compounding the offence charged against him. He also

prays that in the meanwhile, further proceedings in Crime

WP(c).No.3395/09 /2/

No.820/08 may be ordered to be kept in abeyance.

3. Taking into account the above grievance of the writ

petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of with the following

directions;

4. The first respondent shall consider Ext.P1 application

made by the petitioner under Section 18-E of the Kerala Money

Lenders Act, 1958 and pass orders thereon as expeditiously as

possible and at any rate within 4 weeks from the date of

production of a copy of this judgment. In the meanwhile

further proceedings in Crime No.820/08 will stand deferred

for 6 weeks from today.

Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment before

the first and 2nd respondents for compliance.





                                       (ANTONY DOMINIC)
                                             JUDGE
vi/

WP(c).No.3395/09    /2/