High Court Kerala High Court

C.P. Venugopalan vs The Director Of Agriculture on 21 December, 2006

Kerala High Court
C.P. Venugopalan vs The Director Of Agriculture on 21 December, 2006
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 34092 of 2006(H)


1. C.P. VENUGOPALAN, AGRICULTURAL OFFICER,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE,
                       ...       Respondent

2. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.G.BHAGAVAT SINGH

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.K.DENESAN

 Dated :21/12/2006

 O R D E R
                              K.K.DENESAN, J.

                     -----------------------------

                         WP(C)No. 34092 OF 2006

                     -----------------------------

                 Dated this the 21st December, 2006.



                                  JUDGMENT

As per Ext.P1 judgment dated 4.8.2006 this Court

directed the second respondent to consider the appeal filed

by the petitioner and to take decision in accordance with

law as expeditiously as possible, in any event, before

30.11.2006. This writ petition has been filed by the same

petitioner seeking for orders to keep the recovery

proceedings in abeyance on the ground that application

filed before the respondents praying for the very same

relief has not been considered.

2. Govt. Pleader submits that there is no question of

any interim application being considered by the Government

at this stage because the appeal filed by the petitioner

stands already disposed of. Counsel for the petitioner

submits that no such order has been communicated to the

petitioner. Govt. Pleader then submits that he has

requested the Government to make available to the

petitioner a copy of the order passed by the Government by

fax.

3. In the above circumstances this writ petition is

disposed of as infructuous, without prejudice to the right

WPC 34092/2006 2

of the petitioner to challenge the order passed pursuant to

Ext.P1 judgment if he feels so and if so advised.

K.K.DENESAN

Judge

jj