High Court Kerala High Court

C.Paaru vs The State Of Kerala on 25 May, 2010

Kerala High Court
C.Paaru vs The State Of Kerala on 25 May, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 2957 of 2010()


1. C.PAARU, AGED 50 YEARS, W/O. MALINKAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SMT.P.K.PRIYA

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA

 Dated :25/05/2010

 O R D E R
                             K.HEMA, J.
           ----------------------------------------------
               Bail Application No.2957 of 2010
           ----------------------------------------------
                       Dated 25th May, 2010.

                              O R D E R

This petition is for anticipatory bail.

2. The alleged offence is under Section 55(a) of the

Kerala Abkari Act. According to prosecution, Preventive Officer

and party found petitioner carrying 5 litres of arrack in a 5 litre

can. Petitioner could not be arrested, since there was no woman

Police Constable in the police party.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that

petitioner is a coolie and her husband is paralysed since 2007.

She is the only person, who looks after her husband and she was

not involved in the crime as alleged. Petitioner was available in

the house and she was not absconding. Petitioner was not

arrested from the spot. The allegations made against petitioner

are not correct, it is submitted. It is also submitted that petitioner

was not even aware of registration of the crime against her.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that petitioner

was not arrested since no woman Police Constable was present

and thereafter, petitioner was not available in the house. It is also

BA NO.2957/10 2

submitted that charge sheet has been filed.

5. On hearing both sides and considering the non-

arrest of petitioner for a long time, it appears to me that

respondent does not intend to arrest petitioner. But while

submitting the charge, she was shown as absconding. In case

petitioner is arrested, it is likely that she will be remanded. There

is no case that petitioner is involved in any other offence. In the

peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to

grant anticipatory bail to petitioner. Hence, the following order is

passed :

Petitioner shall surrender before the Magistrate Court

concerned within seven days from today and she shall

be released on bail, on her executing a bond for

Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with

two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the

satisfaction of the learned Magistrate, on the following

conditions :

(i) Petitioner shall report before the

Investigating Officer on every Monday

between 10 a.m. and 1 p.m. until further

BA NO.2957/10 3

orders.

(ii) In case petitioner is involved in any offence

of similar nature, her bail is liable to be

cancelled.

Petition is allowed.

K.HEMA, JUDGE.

tgs