High Court Kerala High Court

C.Premachandran Nair vs State Of Kerala on 30 November, 2009

Kerala High Court
C.Premachandran Nair vs State Of Kerala on 30 November, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 34255 of 2009(B)


1. C.PREMACHANDRAN NAIR,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. DIRECTOR, INDIAN SYSTEMS OF MEDICINE,

3. SENIOR MEDICAL OFFICER,

4. DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER (ISM)

                For Petitioner  :SRI.AYYAPPAN SANKAR

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :30/11/2009

 O R D E R
                         ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
                   -------------------------
                   W.P.(C.) No.34255 of 2009 (B)
             ---------------------------------
           Dated, this the 30th day of November, 2009

                            J U D G M E N T

The petitioner joined the Government Ayurveda Hospital,

Kadaykavoor as Cook on 28/07/1993. Immediately thereafter, on

16/08/1993, after making application for Leave Without Allowance

for five years, in anticipation that leave will be sanctioned, he left for

abroad in order to take up employment there. Going by the

pleadings itself, thereafter only on 20/06/2008 he reported for

duty, and thereupon he came to know that by Ext.P4 order dated

25/03/1995, his services were terminated. It is stated that

thereupon the petitioner made Ext.P5 representation and in this writ

petition he seeks an order for its consideration.

2. Evidently, without even getting leave sanctioned the

petitioner absented from duty immediately joining the service. If so,

that was a case of misconduct and the respondents have rightly

initiated action by terminating him from service. Thereafter, he

reported for duty only in 2008. On facts even the theory of medical

WP(C) No.34255/2009
-2-

treatment is unbelievable to be accepted. Therefore, I find

absolutely no merit in the objection raised by the learned counsel

for the petitioner against Ext.P4 order of termination or against the

action of the respondents in not allowing the petitioner to rejoin

duty.

In these circumstances, I do not think that this is a fit case for

this Court to direct consideration of the representation filed by the

petitioner. Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed.

(ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE)
jg