C.R.Chandramohanan vs State Of Kerala on 29 April, 2008

0
85
Kerala High Court
C.R.Chandramohanan vs State Of Kerala on 29 April, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 2493 of 2008()


1. C.R.CHANDRAMOHANAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.BECHU KURIAN THOMAS

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :29/04/2008

 O R D E R
                           R. BASANT, J.

            ````````````````````````````````````````````````````
                     B.A. No. 2493 OF 2008
            ````````````````````````````````````````````````````
             Dated this the 29th day of April, 2008

                              O R D E R

Application for anticipatory bail. Petitioner is the 1st

accused in a crime registered alleging offences punishable,

inter alia, under section 409 IPC. He was the Secretary of a

Government Employees’ Co-operative Society. During the

period 1.4.04 to 31.3.05 he is alleged to have misappropriated

the amount for about Rs.2,00,000/-. FIR was registered on

30.11.07 on the basis of an enquiry report. Investigation is in

progress. The petitioner apprehends imminent arrest.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

the petitioner is innocent. Political rivalry between factions is

prompting the authorities to raise vexatious allegations

against the petitioner. The petitioner may be granted

anticipatory bail, it is prayed.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the

application. He submits that there are no circumstances

BA.2493/08
: 2 :

whatsoever justifying or warranting the invocation of the

discretion under section 438 Cr.P.C.

4. Having considered all the relevant inputs, I find

merit in the opposition by the learned Public Prosecutor. I am

satisfied that there are no features in this case which would

justify the invocation of the extraordinary equitable discretion

under Section 438 Cr.P.C. This, I agree with the learned

Public Prosecutor, is a fit case where the petitioner must

appear before the investigating officer or the learned

Magistrate having jurisdiction and then seek regular bail in the

normal and ordinary course.

5. In the result, this petition is dismissed. Needless to

say, if the petitioner surrenders before the investigating officer

or the learned Magistrate and applies for bail, after giving

sufficient prior notice to the Prosecutor in charge of the case,

the learned Magistrate must proceed to pass appropriate

orders on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)
aks

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *