C S Krishnamurthy S/O C V … vs The Managing Director Bmtc on 5 January, 2010

.  A 'BSK5.--2V?"*"'&31'[age. Bé{figa1orev78.

     S.Shet.tar. Advocate)

IN THE HIGH coumr or KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED TI-{IS 'm£_«:: 51h DAY 01: JANUARY. 2010 
PRESENT " ' 
THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE  V   

AND

THE I-ION'BLE MR.JUSTVI»CE B.sREENwAS;E IGGWBA. 1' 

M1sc.cmL.21223/2009 IN  N0.'I1_:29,X:;0ti'7 (MV)
BETWEEN: '  V' ' ' V

1.

C.S.KrishI1a Murthy, V V
S / 0 CV. Su1’y_a’r.1.araya’fié1′ R130.”
Aged ab0L1tT;64″y:§a1’s.’=_ _ ” ‘
R/0 N0. 1.2′-F_’_–.’Mai:1?, V
91-” Cross, st;as;ti-ir1aga’1v.;i’,–

BSK2%*f¥stag€<3a¥1ga10r"»*zs,%i[ E

2. Smtj-,Padmav’at’hiA, ”
W/0 C S.’Kris’l’1I1ari’mrt–hj?;«.
Aged a15’o._ut 54″y_ea1is; _
R/ONO. 349, 1*2.1I=} main”.

91?-E Cross. Sha-strina_s;a1′.

…Appe11ams

-The Managing Director.

_E£..1~I.¥?£oad.

‘ Ba n,ja101*e–27.

…Respondem -.

(By M/S. Rachana Law Associates. Advocates}

-7-

This iVIis(:.Civi1. is filed under Order 41 Rule 27 of
CPC praying to permit the appellants to produce additional
documentary evidence in the above appeal in the interest of
justice.

This Mise.Ci\/ii coming on for
N.K.Pati1, J’ made the following:

:Order:

orders this day,

The instant Misc. Civil is filed by
Counsel appearing for the _appellants,”::’.’;seel{ing;s-v_V

permission to produce additional ‘doC7fin’ienltary_evideinoe?:

in the above appeal.

2. We have heard the &..l-e’arr_:1ed”-»eourilsel».appearing

for appellants.

3. For the the affidavit filed

along with tlie.diVlise;~Cv’lA§; :,4ti1el’li.nsi.ant lV[is(:.Civil is

allowed, perrmtting appellants to produce additional

documentary’ Veviidenee in the above appeal to

t§n*

». } s’ubsta:1tii-ate l.lL,1[‘.ll_€”‘i.I”‘ ease.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE