IN THE HIGH 00331' 01'' KARNATAKA, DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY j BEFORE THE Roman; MR. JUSTICE S
wan’ PETITION NO. 2.90 or’ 2006 a,a;gEs) k %
CONNECT,E”D_WYPHV_ k
WRIT PETITION NOS. 1324 &_13o9 Of=’.2G€)6{L!3–RES)
BETWEEN
ill war no Aj ” .%
C SIEDARAMANEA s;o’a. é3iiA!4:_§3RANNA
40 ms, R/C %NRUPA’rHUNGA’%BAoAvANE
Hxgnrua $22143, Vcnnmppram
In xa;_L’.1s:§4i§é¥
I “F~2:\DHA mo N,.sRmvAs
711A(}F:D 42 Y’RS,’– * ”
% -.fI1ft~,f«.A’}.””a.,I J R EXTENS!ON,
4HV2:2mm 572143,
“.c2irrz2;;x3u:e_.GA nxsrmcr.
_ mm; 1809 or was
GANGADHARA B P
SIG P.K.NAYAK AGE!) 40 YRS
Bl-IARATH GAS HIRIYUR 143 g
‘I
M
PETITIONER
. .. PETFTIONER
K
2
CHITRADURGA DIS!’
2 H C THIPPESWAMY SIG CfiANDRA.NNA
AGED 33 YRS
R/AT NRUPATHUNGA BADAVANE
HIRIYUR 143
CHFFRADURGA DIS!’
3 1* MAHEBUNNISSA w/0 NA2f;EéR 2′ 7
AGED ABOUT’ 45 YRS T ..
RIAT NRUPATHUNGA BAI)AVA.NE_ _
HIRIYUR 143
CHXTRADURGA 913′!’
4 LAKKE aawm 3,19 aE;frm §:<j\1IpA '
AGEDABOUT43-YRS ; A
R/0 BEBSND GOVT. _;~3U3,s"fANIs._ * .
HIRIYUR1é}3 A, =
mrmmunm .
GOWRAMMA w,I_o ”
man ABOUT ._ ‘
R/AT NRum’mJNGA BADAVANE
HIRIYUR ‘4 …… 14 V
mflaanarnaa msfr
sAvIrIe;;MM.a’*a(/ 0′ mimmmna
AGED ABQUTV5E$_’Yfi$’
Ly j”«R,tAT NREJPATHLINGA BADAVANE
HIRIYUR 143 “V ”
. .i§:1rrRAniJRc;A:.1)1s’r
_«__s,4(;Am)i;L SAMADSAB
A2301}? 43 YRS
R,:A?~xRuPA’m~mnGA BADAVANE
mezvuw 143
RC1-i£’l’RADURGADIS’I’ M
THESE PETITIONS, coflmxe on FOR oRDE1§zS.:Fm1s
my TI-IE coum’ MAD-E WING: «
Since common question oflaw K ”
decision mak:1n’ g in these pcfitioiies, the.-,. ” .
the learned counsel
clubbed, finally (§i_spo$éd-.c:flTf§by this
common order.
of this court directing’
fl1c.iDcputy to submit his explanation as
was taken to comply with the
in the order dam 19.7.1999 in
the Deputy Commissioner by
‘ “éaIa;n1Vihication dated 2.7.2008 while stating that the
orignal rewards in W.P.21260/1999 were not
mfraceable and theme was no material forthcoming
crvertheaction byhispmdccessorir1ofl’m,
from today.
@532
5
has action. by issmng
petitioners in W.P.21260/99 o:n,”3G;6.A2’D08.l,_Ta1a;EIVweuk2
require’ four months’ time to .
to file a report in detail.
In the light of by the Deputy
Commissiongr,’ I I 1 — for decision
making disposed
off. It is £1 Commissioner
shall issue petitioners in these
petitions, but am Municipality and the
imk%W.P;2125o/99 and camply with
T. in any event, within a
Sd/-1
Judge