C.Vikraman Nair vs State Of Kerala on 17 June, 2010

0
124
Kerala High Court
C.Vikraman Nair vs State Of Kerala on 17 June, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

LA.App..No. 487 of 2010()


1. C.VIKRAMAN NAIR, T.C.31/1021,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR

                For Petitioner  :SRI.GOPAKUMAR R.THALIYAL

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.K.ABDUL REHIM

 Dated :17/06/2010

 O R D E R
          PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ.
                      ------------------------
                     L.A.A.No. 487 OF 2010
                      ------------------------

              Dated this the 17th day of June, 2010

                            JUDGMENT

Pius C.Kuriakose, J.

Under challenge in this appeal preferred by the claimant is

the award of the Reference Court. The case pertains to

acquisition of land in Pettah village for the purpose of

construction of the New International Passenger Terminal at

Chackai. The Land Acquisition Officer awarded land value at the

rate of Rs.74,105/- per Are. The Reference Court would refix the

land value at Rs.1,11,150/- per Are. We notice various

judgments of this Court pertaining to acquisition of land in the

same village for the same purpose pursuant to the same

notification. It is noticed enhancement by 90% over what was

awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer has been generally

approved in those cases. Keeping in mind that aspect, we allow

the appeal to the extent of refixing the value of the land under

acquisition at Rs.1,41,000/- per Are.

2. The appeal is allowed as above. The appellant will be

entitled for all statutory benefits admissible under Section 23

L.A.A..No.487/2010 2

(2), 23(1A) and Section 28 of the Act on the total enhanced

compensation to which he becomes eligible by virtue of this

judgment. The parties are directed to suffer their costs.

While drafting the decree, the Registry will have due

regard to the order passed by this court in C.M.Appln.767/2010.

PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE

C.K.ABDUL REHIM , JUDGE
dpk

L.A.A..No.487/2010 3

PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JJ.

————————

C.M.Appln.767/2010 in L.A.A.No.487 OF 2010

————————

Dated this the 28th day of May, 2010

O R D E R

Pius C.Kuriakose, J.

L.A.A..No.487/2010 4

This application seeking condonation of the delay of 937

days is very stiffly opposed by the learned senior Government

Pleader. However, on the consideration that causes should be

allowed to be adjudicated as far as possible on their merits

rather than decided on technicalities, we are inclined to condone

the delay imposing conditions.

2. This application will stand allowed subject to the

following conditions:

i).The appellant shall pay a sum of

Rs.3000/-(Rupees Three Thousand only) as

cost to the Government through the office of

the Advocate General within two weeks from

today and produce receipt before this court.

ii). The appellant shall pay a further

amount of Rs.2,000/-(Rupees Two Thousand

only) to the High Court Legal Services

Committee within the same time limit and

produce receipt before this court.

ii). In the event of the appeal being

allowed and the appellant becoming eligible

L.A.A..No.487/2010 5

for enhanced compensation, such enhanced

compensation will not carry interest otherwise

admissible under Section 28 of the Act during

the period of 937 days condoned by this

order.

Annex a copy of this order to the judgment to be passed in the

appeal.

Upon noticing receipt against the payment of the amounts

as directed above, the Registry will number the appeal and send

up the same for admission.

PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE

C.K.ABDUL REHIM , JUDGE
dpk

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *