High Court Kerala High Court

Carrier Airconditioning & … vs The Assistant Commissioner on 13 May, 2010

Kerala High Court
Carrier Airconditioning & … vs The Assistant Commissioner on 13 May, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 14502 of 2010(K)


1. CARRIER AIRCONDITIONING & REFRIGERATION
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE INTELLIGENCE INSPECTOR,

3. INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

                For Petitioner  :SRI.R.MURALIDHARAN (AROOR)

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER

 Dated :13/05/2010

 O R D E R
                                     A.K.BASHEER, J.
                    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                              W.P.(C)No.14502 OF 2010
                    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                       Dated this the 13th day of May 2010

                                         JUDGMENT

The grievance of the petitioner, who is a registered dealer under the

Kerala Value Added Tax Act, is that its goods have been detained by

respondent No.2 illegally and without any valid or justifiable reasons and

demanded the petitioner to remit a sum of Rs.1,55,035/- as a condition

precedent for release of the same. Various reasons have been cited by

respondent No.2 in Ext.P4 for detention of the goods. Learned counsel for the

petitioner contends that it was only a transfer of goods from one godown to

another and that the reasons stated by respondent No.2 in Ext.P4 are wholly

untenable.

2. I do not propose to deal with the contentions raised by the parties at

this stage. Necessarily the statutory authority has to decide the issue.

However, in the meanwhile, respondent No.2 is directed to release the goods

to the petitioner on its executing a simple bond for the amount demanded

under Ext.P4. The statutory authority shall decide the issue strictly on its

merit and in accordance with law within two months from the date of receipt

of a copy of this judgment.

Writ petition is disposed of.

(A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE)
jes