CRA-1906-2010 (RAJKUMAR YADA V Vs THE STA TE 0F MADHYA PRADESH) 05-05-2015 Shri Ajay Shukla, learned Government Advocate for the respondent/State seeks time to file objections to the application for
suspension of sentence and grant of bail.
Two weeks time as prayed for is granted.
(SHANTANU KEMKAR) (RAJ ENDRA MAHAJAN)
JUDGE JUDGE
M.Cr.C.No. 2315/2015
Smt. Somvati vs State of M.P.
07 / 0 4 / 2 0 1 4
Shri U.S. Tomar, Advocate for the applicant.
Shri R. K. Agarwal, Panel Lawyer for the
respondent /State.
Heard on admission.
Admit.
Case diary is available.
This is the first bail application on behalf of the
applicant under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. The applicant is
in custody since 16.02.2015 in connection with Crime
No.12/2015 registered at Police Station Tighra, District
Gwalior for the offence punishable under Sections 304B,
498A, 201/34 of IPC and section 3/4 of Dowry
Prohibition Act.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant
that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely
implicated in the case. It is further submitted that
applicant is resident of Gwalior. The applicant is in
custody since 16.02.2015 and conclusion of trial would
take considerable time. On the aforesaid grounds, it is
prayed that the applicants be released on bail.
Learned Panel Lawyer for the State vehemently
opposed the application.
Considering the totality of the facts and
circumstances of the case coupled with the material
M.Cr.C.No. 2315/2015
available on record, the application under Section 439 of
Cr.P.C. may be allowed. Consequently, it is hereby
allowed.
It is directed that applicant – Somvati be released on
bail on her furnishing a personal bond in the sum of
Rs.30,000 / – (Rupees Thirty Thousand Only) with one
solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of
the CJM, Gwalior securing her presence before the trial
Court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard
during trial.
Certified copy as per rules.
(SUBHASH KAKADE)
JUDGE
neetu
WP-4830-2014
(ABHISHEK SHUKLA Vs BANK OF MAHARASHTRA)
01-04-2015
Parties through their counsel.
I.A. No. 5707/2014
This application has been filed by the respondent No. 3. Let
notice of this application be filed by the appellant within two weeks.
List this application for disposal after two weeks.
In case the respondent No. 3 has already taken the possession then
the order of status quo will not disturb the possession. The order is
therefore modified to their extent.
(MOOL CHAND GARG)
JUDGE
Criminal Appeal No. 15/2011
filfllflgfllfi
This case is listed today as reference case alongwith
connected Criminal Appeal No.80/2011. After passing the
order in such connected appeal, case is adjourned with a
direction to place it along-with such connected Criminal
Appeal.
(U.C. Maheshwari) (Sheel Nagu)
J “(19 8 Judge
MKB
CRA-866-2015
(RAVI PRAKASH BARMAN ALIAS RAVI Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)
BARMAN
30-03-2015
Shri L.P.Singh, learned counsel for the appellant.
Shri Vivek Lakhera, learned Panel lawyer for the respondent/State.
Office is directed to requisition the record of the trial court.
List the matter thereafter.
(S.K. SETH)
JUDGE
SA-- 102 3-2007 (SMT.TASKEEN BEGAM Vs NANI BAI) 18-03-2015
Shri Ajay Mishra, learned counsel for the appellant submits
that he will prepare to argue the matter within one week.
Matter be listed on 7.4.2015 to be shown at the top of the
list.
(MOOL CHAND GARG)
JUDGE
Cr.A.No.312/2015
17/03/2015
Shri Nilesh Manore, learned counsel for
the appellant.
Shri R.S. Bais, learned Deputy
Government Advocate for the
respondent/State.
Heard on I.A. No. 1513/2015.
This is an application for suspension
of sentence. The appellant had been
convicted under Section 325 of IPC and
sentenced to 6 months R.I.
Learned counsel submits that during
course of trial, appellant remained on
bail. Trial court has suspended the
execution of jail sentence after conviction
also but for a limited period. At the time
of initial arrest, appellant has been
remained in jail for two days and there is
no likelihood of early hearing.
After hearing learned counsel for the
parties and considering the facts and
circumstances of the case, the application
.
is allowed and it is directed that the
execution of the jail sentence alone passed
against the applicant shall remain
suspended during the pendency of this
revision and he be released on bail upon
his furnishing personal bond in the sum of
Rs. 30,000/ with one surety in the like
amount to the satisfaction of the CJM for
his appearance before the Registry of this
Court on 12/08/2015 and on such further
dates as may be fixed in this behalf by the
Registry during the pendency of this
revision.
C.C. on payment of usual charges.
(T.K. Kaushal)
Judge
karuna
.
SA- 1 94- 2 0 1 0 (GAJANAND Vs RAKESH) 09-03-2015
Shri R.C. SharIna, learned counsel for the appellant.
It is informed by the learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant has
died. He prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to take steps in that regard.
(RAVI SHANKAR JHA)
JUDGE
Writ Petition No.1992/2015
03.3.2015
Mr.Himanshu Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Heard on the question of admission as well as
I.A.No.1447/2015, an application for stay.
On payment of process fee by registered post with
acknowledgement due within a week, issue notice of this writ
petition to the respondents. Notices are made returnable
within a period of four weeks.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner is ready and willing to abide by such terms and
conditions that may be imposed by this Court and shall cross-
examine the Plaintiff Witness on a date which may be fixed by
the Court.
In view of aforesaid submission made by learned
counsel for the petitioner and in the facts of the case, it is
directed that further proceeding of Case No.H.M.139/2014
pending before Family Court, Satna shall remain stayed till
next date of hearing.
Let the writ petition be listed for orders in the week
commencing 06.4.2015.
C.C. as per rules.
(Alok Aradhe)
Judge
RM
FA.36.2015
02.03.2015
Shri Ankur Mody, Advocate, for the appellant.
On payment of process fee within three days, notice be
issued to the respondent for admission as well as on I.A.
No.907/2015 which is an application preferred under Order XLI
Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, making the same
returnable within four weeks.
(Sheel Nagu) (B.D. Rathi)
Judge Judge
pd