Chacko vs Shaji on 20 February, 2008

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

CRP No. 830 of 2005()


1. CHACKO, AGED 61,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. WILSON, AGED 32,

                        Vs



1. SHAJI, S/O. KUNJAPPAN,
                       ...       Respondent

2. P.P. SEBASTIAN, S/O. PAULO,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.SREESAKUMAR

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :20/02/2008

 O R D E R
                                                    K.T. SANKARAN, J.

                           ...................................................................................

                                                C.R.P.No.  830   OF  2005

                           ...................................................................................

                                         Dated this the 20th February, 2008




                                                            O R D E R

In spite of granting enough time on 31.08.2005 and 29.09.2005, the defects are

not cured. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that two weeks’ time may be

granted to cure the defects. I do not think that the prayer can be granted. Moreover,

the Civil Revision Petition is against dismissal of an application filed under Order

XXXIX Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which was confirmed in appeal. No

revision is maintainable against an order under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of the Code of

Civil Procedure.

For the aforesaid reasons, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default.

K.T. SANKARAN,

JUDGE.

lk