Gujarat High Court High Court

Champaklal vs Arvindbhai on 30 September, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Champaklal vs Arvindbhai on 30 September, 2010
Author: K.A.Puj,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CRA/682/1998	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CIVIL
REVISION APPLICATION No. 682 of
1998 
 
=========================================================

 

CHAMPAKLAL
PURSOTTAMDAS MODI & 1 - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

ARVINDBHAI
DALICHAND DARJI & 7 - Opponent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
MB GANDHI for
Applicant(s) : 1, 
MR ANAND L SHARMA for Opponent(s) : 1, 
RULE
UNSERVED for Opponent(s) : 2,4 - 5, 8, 
UNSERVED-EXPIRED (R) for
Opponent(s) : 3, 
RULE SERVED for Opponent(s) : 6 -
7. 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 30/09/2010 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

In
this matter, order of admission was passed on 10.08.1998. The Rule
was served on respondent No.1 and Mr. Anand L. Sharma, learned
advocate appears on behalf of respondent No.1. Despite service of
Rule on respondent Nos.6 and 7, nobody appears. Respondent Nos.2, 4,
5 and 8 are not served till this date. Respondent No.3 has expired
during the pendency of this Civil Revision Application. No steps have
been taken by the petitioners to bring legal heirs of respondent No.3
on record. Hence this Civil Revision Application stands abated qua
respondent No.3. Fresh notice of Rule be issued on the respondent
Nos.2, 4, 5 and 8, making it returnable on 26th October,
2010.

It
is made clear that if the unserved respondents are not served or if
the process fees are not paid by the petitioners, the Civil Revision
Application shall stand dismissed qua those unserved respondents.

(K.A. Puj, J.)

Safir*

   

Top