Chanamma vs Sardar Ali 2/O Vazir Ali on 21 August, 2008

  AGEQ17 YE1Ai"2S,AT"
 gets. 'SHARANATTA
  .qsz3E:' :44 YEARS,

  «AN};N:)AYYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
CIRCUTT BENCH AT GULBARGA & A Q
DATES THIS THE 2181' DAY OF AUGUST .1 T   
PRESENT VMW v  ' 
THE HONBLE MR. JUS1'ICE_K. sr§is:§:i21fi;$sR  ~ = V' 
THE H()N'BLE MR. Jusracfi 13. '.S1?éE;?JfVASE £:;o"waA
M.F.A.NO.     

BETWEEN:

w/0. LATE REV;'1fiASIf){.I:I%£z'3;f5A MATH
AGE :39 TEARS, o¢jc;L4 1-z.Qus::--Ha'Ln

2. VISTTWANATH * V % A. = _ 
S/O. LATE REVANAS!-DI3APi'A MATH
_ AGE:"1_;9 YEARS, " - V
.   ..... 

   
sjQ;'-LATE REVANASIDDAPPA MATH

" "---SiQ.TLA'1'I:'I»--- REVANASIDDAPPA MATH

 VS] LATE REVANASISDAPPA MATH
" 11 YEARS,

' (APPELLANTS 3 TO 5 ARE NHNORS

%/

 



'V "---=F»'RAYING..  'm. ZALLOW THIS APPEAL, MODIFY THE
11j3'TT.1quDQMEm.,A§;D AWARD DATED 09.05.2007 PASSED BY
_ fff:§~§E. :(3E¥.*IL JUDGE (SR.DN.)/MACI', swam, 1N M.V.C.
 4_""VI§IG_6f~.2i)Of§AA'AAND AWARE) compsnsmxon AS CLAIMED iN
'% CLAIM PETI'I'i0N.

     This M.F.A. coming on for Orders this day, SREEDHAR
 "RAG. J, dalivered the following:--

UNDER GUARDIANSHIP OF THEIR

MOTHER APPELLANT NO. 1)

ALL ARE R/O. SHANKAR-WADE,   ._
TQ; CHTITAPUR.  »~~A.PPEI;LAVN'TS" V  

(BY SR1. SUBHAS}-I MALLAPUR,:;§nv.)'JT'~%     
AND: T' M V' V' 

1. SARDAR ALI
S/O. VAZIR ALI, V  
MAJOR, occ: DRIVER,  
R/O. GULBARGA.

2. MOHD. EASFAGIRASAB, 
S/O. ABDUL FAifZ,  V . =
AGE: MAJOR.     
OCC: OWNER oFi_'Lg:)RR?«T   ',  V
NO. MEI-i_,5A1.f58;'~»M_   -
R.O. MAILOOR';  .
TQ/ms'r:.._B1a3AR. ' - 

3. THE D1v1s10:sJAL%M2a:qA:}ER;\.»}v
THE ORIENTAL' n_sIsuzeAzssvcE' 00., Lrm,
VGULBVARGA.  V
     --------  REJSPONDENTS
 (BYASRHIEERESH .3. PATEL, FGR R3)

1  fS'v""FILED U/s. 173(1) 01? M.v. ACT

%/

 



3
JUTEHT

Sri. Veereeh B. Patil, learned Counsel takes nojice ~

respondent No.3. Notice to respondent Nos. 1 and 2'7n;r:hc:f_a.re 'A

driver and owner is dispensed with.

One Revanasiddappa Math' wjho '  

wheeler was hit by the lorry and   tine 
injuries. The deceased is    the time of
accident. Wife and    seeking

comP€nsatir5n. 'A "* .'

2. The decéegedvv v}a_s."V  in Cement Company as
cpnsixuetfiefi "Worker  Gfflbarga. The income of the
   at Rs.2,400j-- p.111. As per unit

sys'Ate'm_'  3 Rs.800/- to be defrayed towards

 Rs.1,600/-- p.331. would enure to the

- _. f ;of  1. dependents. The total loss of dependency

  \7é?c1.ils3 be .!;és.1,600 (income) 3: 12 (months) X 14 fmultipiiezrj '-=

~--. Widow is entitletti to a compensation of

 'R-s«~.V2(),0w/--- towards loss of consortium, the petitioners

%/



together entitled to a compensation of Rs.20,000]-    
loss of expectancy, Rs.10,000/- towards fimneral... Z
In all the petitioners are entitled  , 
Rs.3,18,8{)0/- as against   %
Txibunai. On the enhanced  tfic  
entitled to interest at 6% p.fa~..._._¢r  till
payment. The entire   shall

be payable to the   of minors

shall be kept in   édgtaia majority.
    in part.

   sci!'
 .....  

Sd/-1,
Judge