High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Chandan Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 4 August, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Chandan Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 4 August, 2011
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Cr.Misc. No.25171 of 2011

                              Chandan Kumar, Son of Surendra Sahni.
                                              Versus
                                       The State Of Bihar
                                            -----------

2 04.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner is not named in the first information

report and one month later was arrested on the basis of the

location of the looted mobile and he has no criminal antecedent.

In view of such, let the petitioner, above named be

released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (five

thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other

surety to be fixed by the court below to the satisfaction of Chief

Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Patliputra P.S.

Case No. 86 of 2011 subject to the conditions (i) That one of the

bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an

affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the

petitioner and another bailors shall be the brother of the

petitioner namely Amar Kumar. The bailors will undertake to

furnish information to the court about any change in the address

of the petitioner, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the

petitioner is not an accused in any other case and, if he is, he

shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailors shall also state

on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the
2

petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after

his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will

be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on

the ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will give an

undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given

date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do

so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail

will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (v) That

the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he

fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to

be cancelled.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has

been implicated repeatedly at the instance of the local police,

who is hostile to the petitioner, and seeks protection of a person

well reputed doing social service in the area. Under the

circumstances, the petitioner will report to Mr. Kishore Kunal,

Chairman, Bihar Religious Trust Board, Bihar, Patna, within

fifteen days of his release on provisional bail for a period of six

months and file a certificate about the same in the court within

the stipulated time. In case, the petitioner fails to file certificate,

notice shall be sent to him for cancellation of bail, (ii) That once

the petitioner reports to Mr. Kunal, Mr. Kunal is requested to

evolve a method by which without affecting the petitioner’s

present vocation, if any, the petitioner can be made socially

productive so that an effort is made to bring him back in the
3

main stream of the society/he is given adequate protection and

(iii) At the end of the six months, the petitioner will be required

to file a certificate in the court below granted by Mr. Kishore

Kunal. If the certificate granted to the petitioner is found

satisfactory, the court below will confirm the provisional bail

granted to the petitioner or else will issue notice for cancellation

of bail.

( Anjana Prakash, J.)
Md. Ibrarul