High Court Karnataka High Court

Chandrakala D/O Manikrao vs The Director Wormens And … on 8 August, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Chandrakala D/O Manikrao vs The Director Wormens And … on 8 August, 2008
Author: L.Narayana Swamy
 

H»: KARNATAKA HIGH COURT czacurr BENCH, A*r5§U :9-3'éxfiG5;.«"T %  
Daieé this the 831 day of    x A 
Bcfm _  _ . %

THE HGN'BLE MR.JusTIc3j;;-.:s;ARAYAr~m.  

W P No. 40:07 of2f)(i£5'v{S?~--~.§§ESj   

Between:
Chandrakaia         

D/0 Manilcrao H    . U  » 

Aged about 25 ye.:arS, "~.  b if  V.

Occupation: AngaflWezd§§A;Assfistant,;' ~

At Anganwac1i'Centitj- No}§2,"--  -- , 

Marahalli,  M       %

Taluka as District Bidar;   _ V» "  Petitioner

(By Sri K M .§}i1:;;té$V'r'Z4ic§.:rt>\r::é::e)
And: ' ' V" H V I

1;  "rag Biztctor, 
 'W?«:ax'3':1e:;1's.._&&.A C3}1iid3fe::1's Welfare
Multistoxy Building,
 '*»'-mécihi,
' . VBangak>re.A._

' . 'I.'heJai3;1t Sizector,
 T i'!0mc:'iz's as Chiidren's
r. _V - . f:W¢';,;I:fare Department,
%   ;S=v1barga-

  ~ ... . 'I'}::e Chief Secretary,
  Zilla Panchayat,
Bidar.



 

 

4. The Assistant Director,
Women's 65 Chiisdrexfs
Welfare Department,   -
Bidar. 

5. The Chiid Development,

Pro3'ec::1:Oficer,      
Bidar.  " _ '~R¢spond§nts

(By Sri N Kumar -  Advmm.-zxié)

Writ Petitioxl is flied seekifig fiiofice issued by
the respondent No.55 xr2',de  dajicd 1j.9g'&7»/ 2008.

This Writ fcfi my heaziing before
the Court today, $340131″?Ifiééifiihé’–ffiflfivyiing;

{ ‘Q§QER:

The 1ear§1:::d”{‘xoVcr;fi1§g§n§f is dimctcd to take notics,

The pefitionvéi” ,.’¢1:tV.-aAzs’ci1ail*2211§ed the endorssgment issued by the

a11€1..«s0ugj11v{“f£§r quashing the same. She submits

that 3:352’: ‘as an Anganawadi Sahayala’ can 29/5;’ 2008

,_ asf per s:’u1c:e than she has been Working. Dasggitg

‘7T§h€ same, has been issued by the 55” resmndent an

‘ afiezgaiiions that she has possessed Balavikasa

making false sfaatcmem. The petitienar submits tha’:

gjaiggfions made: in A1mcxure~E is false and fztivoleus and

.};$ef(31§.é doing so, no Gpportuxflty has been giving’

The learned adéiiionai Government Advoca

necessary direction couid be issued to 113::

541:2: A f5é3;3ojnd t~§:fi2_
appropriate order after afiorfiing full oppo

In View of the above, writ

431 nespondem to afford an ogpor1:u13ity pass

appropriate csrder.

dfi """       . 
ak     %   Judge

 

 

ts  that ., V' 

 to  _"pe%.£f:i0:J¢e.r.< "

is disiacséd the