High Court Kerala High Court

Chandrakumar vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 4 April, 2007

Kerala High Court
Chandrakumar vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 4 April, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 2017 of 2007()


1. CHANDRAKUMAR,S/O.SANKARA PILLAI,KARUKKAN
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

 Dated :04/04/2007

 O R D E R
                            V.RAMKUMAR, J.

                             ----------------------------

                     Bail Application No. 2017/2007

                            -----------------------------

                    Dated this  4th day of April, 2007


                                  O R D E R

The petitioner, who is the first accused in Crime

No.190/2003 of Aryanad Police Station for offences punishable

under Sections 143, 147, 451, 294(b) and 354 IPC read with

Section 149 IPC, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. Consequent on the non appearance of the petitioner

in C.C.No.674/2003 before the J.F.C.M-I, Nedumangadu, his

bail was cancelled and non bailable warrants of arrest had been

issued against him. Such being the position, I am not inclined

to nullify the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction

by granting anticipatory bail. There is no reason why the

petitioner should not surrender before the Magistrate and seek

regular bail.

3. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the

Magistrate and files an application for regular bail within two

weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of,

preferably on the same day on which it is filed, after examining

the explanation offered by the petitioner for his previous non

B.A.2017/2007

2

appearance. Until such disposal, non bailable warrants of

arrest if any, pending against the petitioner shall not be

executed.

V.RAMKUMAR,

JUDGE

mrcs