High Court Kerala High Court

Cherada Khalid vs K.V.Pradeep Kumar on 5 August, 2008

Kerala High Court
Cherada Khalid vs K.V.Pradeep Kumar on 5 August, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MACA.No. 1023 of 2006()


1. CHERADA KHALID, AGED 30 YERS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. K.V.PRADEEP KUMAR, S/O.KARTHIAYANI,
                       ...       Respondent

2. ABDUL BASHEER, S/O.UNNIMOHAMMED,

3. ORINETAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.K.AJITH KUMAR

                For Respondent  :SRI.GEORGE CHERIAN (THIRUVALLA)

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

 Dated :05/08/2008

 O R D E R
                     M.N. KRISHNAN, J.
               = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
                M.A.C.A. NO. 1023 OF 2006
             = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
        Dated this the 5th day of August, 2008.

                      J U D G M E N T

This appeal is preferred against the award of the Motor

Accidents Claims Tribunal, Manjeri in O.P.(MV)877/02. The

petitioner, a head load worker aged 30 years, sustained

injuries in a road accident. He has been awarded a

compensation of Rs.26,385/-. It is against that decision, the

present appeal is preferred.

2. A perusal of the award would reveal that he had

suffered an abrasion of 2 x 2 cm. on the right knee, a similar

abrasion on the right leg and X-ray revealed a fracture on

the left maxilla. He was treated as an inpatient in the

hospital for nine days. The Tribunal has awarded him a loss

of earnings for one year, i.e.Rs.15,000/-, another amount of

Rs.9,000/- towards pain and sufferings, then for medical

expenses, extra nourishment and transport to hospital.

Granting of one year’s loss of earning would cover all other

temporary disability, loss of amenities and enjoyment in life

M.A.C.A. 1023 OF 2006
-:2:-

and utmost for such a person the actual loss of earnings

would be only for two months. So when extra amount is

awarded under that head, most probably the Tribunal has

applied its mind on those inconveniences and granted such a

sum. Therefore, on an over all analysis of the case would

reveal that the Tribunal has awarded a just and reasonable

compensation which does not call for any interference.

Hence the appeal is dismissed.

M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE.

ul/-