High Court Kerala High Court

Cherukuppayil Muhammed Mkunhi vs The State Of Kerala on 10 June, 2009

Kerala High Court
Cherukuppayil Muhammed Mkunhi vs The State Of Kerala on 10 June, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 2802 of 2009()


1. CHERUKUPPAYIL MUHAMMED MKUNHI,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. VANNAN KUTTOYIL NAVAS, S/O. AMMAD,
3. JASHEER, S/O. SOOPY, AGED 22 YEARS,
4. JAMSHEERO, S/O. MOYDI, AGED 21 YEARS,

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.B.ARUNKUMAR

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :10/06/2009

 O R D E R
                            K.T.SANKARAN, J.
                        ------------------------------
                           B.A.No.2802 of 2009
                       -------------------------------
                  Dated this the 10th day of June, 2009




                                  ORDER

This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of

the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioners are accused Nos.1, 2,

4 and 5 in Crime No.178 of 2009 of Perambra Police Station.

2. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under

Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 324 and 308 read with Section 149 of

the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is stated that the first petitioner was arrested on 20.5.2009

and he was released on regular bail. Therefore, this Bail Application in

so far as it relates to the first petitioner has become infructuous. It is

also stated that accused No.3 was arrested on 17.4.2009 and he was

also released on bail. This Bail Application is being considered only in

respect of petitioners No.2 to 4, who are accused Nos.2, 4 and 5.

4. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case,

the nature of the offence, the injury sustained and other

circumstances, I am of the view that anticipatory bail can be granted

to the petitioners No.2 to 4. There will be a direction that in the event

of the arrest of the petitioners No.2 to 4, the officer in charge of the

BA No. 2802/2009 2

police station shall release them on bail for a period of one month on

their executing bond for Rs.25,000/- each with two solvent sureties for

the like amount to the satisfaction of the officer concerned, subject to

the following conditions:

a) Petitioners No.2 to 4 shall report before the investigating officer
between 9 A.M. and 11 A.M. on alternate Mondays, till the final
report is filed or until further orders;

b) Petitioners No.2 to 4 shall appear before the investigating officer
for interrogation as and when required;

c) Petitioners No.2 to 4 shall not try to influence the prosecution
witnesses or tamper with the evidence;

d) Petitioners No.2 to 4 shall not commit any offence or indulge in
any prejudicial activity while on bail;

e) On the expiry of the period mentioned above, petitioners No.2 to
4 shall surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek
regular bail;

f) In case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, the
bail shall be liable to be cancelled.

The Bail Application is allowed to the extent indicated above.

K.T.SANKARAN,
JUDGE
csl