Gujarat High Court High Court

Chief vs Mohmad on 27 January, 2011

Gujarat High Court
Chief vs Mohmad on 27 January, 2011
Author: Jayant Patel,&Nbsp;Honourable J.C.Upadhyaya,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CA/714/2011	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION - FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY No. 714 of 2011
 

In


 

LETTERS
PATENT APPEAL (STAMP NUMBER) No. 2681 of 2010
 

In
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 2143 of 2008
 

With


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 715 of 2011
 

In
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (STAMP NUMBER) No. 2704 of 2010
 

To


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 717 of 2011 

 

In
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (STAMP NUMBER) No. 2703 of 2010
 

 
 
=========================================================

 

CHIEF
OFFICER - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

MOHMAD
IRSHAD HUSENBHAI BALOCH & 3 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================

 

 
Appearance
: 
MR
MURALI N DEVNANI for
Petitioner(s) : 1, 
MR PARDIWALA with MS RAVAL for Respondent No.1
 

MR NJ
SHAH, AGP for Respondents
No.2-4 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE J.C.UPADHYAYA
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 27/01/2011 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL)

Rule.

Ms.Raval, learned Counsel waives service of notice of Rule for the
respondent workmen and Mr.Shah, learned AGP waives service of notice
of Rule for the other respondents.

The
present application is for condonation of delay of 5 days in
preferring the appeal against the judgement and order passed by the
learned Single Judge in the concerned Special Civil Applications.

Heard
Mr.Devnani, learned Counsel for the applicant, Mr.Pardiwala, learned
Counsel appearing with Ms.Raval for the respondent workmen and
Mr.Shah, learned AGP for the other respondents.

Considering
the facts and circumstances and in view of the grounds mentioned in
the application for condonation of delay, sufficient cause is made
out. Hence, delay deserves to be condoned and, therefore, condoned.

The
applications are disposed of. Rule made absolute accordingly.

The
concerned Letters Patent Appeals be listed for hearing on 3.2.2011.

(Jayant Patel, J.)

(J.

C. Upadhyaya, J.)

vinod

   

Top