IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.25198 of 2010
SANJAY NAT, s/o Isahak Nat
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR
with
Cr.Misc. No.30131 of 2010
CHINTU NAT, son of Late Sakur Nat
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
-----------
3/ 25.10.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the
State.
The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for
the offence under sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal
Code.
It has been submitted that the petitioners are not
named in the First Information Report but subsequently on
the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused
certain articles were recovered from their house but with
regard to the articles recovered from Sanjay Nat the same
did not relate to the present occurrence whereas the
articles recovered from the house of Chintu Nat were not
put on Test Identification parade.
Considering the same, let the petitioners above
2
named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of
Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the
like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the
court concerned to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with
Majhaulia P.S.Case No. 315 of 2009 , subject to the
conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close
relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving
genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners and
the other bailor shall be the wife /son of the petitioners.
The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the
Court about any change in address of the petitioners. (ii)
That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will
inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated
in any other case of similar nature after their release in the
present case and thereafter the court below will be at
liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on
ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioners will give an
undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the
given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if
they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in
any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for
3
reasons of misuse, and (iv) That the petitioners will be
well represented on each date if they fail to do so on two
consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.
Ashwini/- ( Anjana Prakash, J. )