High Court Karnataka High Court

Christopher David vs Thabitha David on 19 January, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Christopher David vs Thabitha David on 19 January, 2010
Author: Ajit J Gunjal


% ‘aéggsaaaaa 5632295

any-w,a’m0_r’V(m”O¢«flM”‘flU’fifl””W mmm wwwuw-..::r mmxuvmannn 2-nun Luum Ur KMKNRIAKR. HIGH COVE?’ CW’ KRMNATAKA HWM Cfifififl? 0?’ mwmnm H36″ C0111?

In THE HIQ§’£Q§RT Q? KaR&A?AKA aw 3A§aALe2E{*fT;’

nssraa ‘rags THE 19″‘ 333′!’ as JA}Ji.§AR’:’ 231;; *’

333323 _Mm%_ % K
TEE H$fi’EL$ sgswzca Aazwlg svN3Aé ‘,’=’

am? 9E’§’I’£’E{3f~E ac. zaeifiiwls ::”;”-‘6’mC
aawyasm : ‘ A :

sax mmzsremm navxn
35:2: {ME A A%4,==.z%§z:,2¢ , ‘
A539 AEEBUT 32 YEARS V ‘
axgw m0.11, E” ?;aa£f._ g “g:_*,;_ -~,
2″ mass, HUNE”2’P.?E_A ;%;;.:’L§I:%:s=:% _
czmzcszmxeszsa smfia 2 ~ ” .

§LsE€”:”R$!%;TCI’§”‘z’ I _
§A.P~£$fi1;i;$RE 5fifi..3_..§$”=._ ” ._ ‘

V” *»5. ” . , I ?E?E?IGfiER

Ea? sax R S&§fik§fi,’A§V§§ ‘- *
Am ‘ V
s§éT4%*?:’mz?¥::a fiwia %%%%% 14 .
§f$ CHRE$?G9HRR aavzn

AGEE-EzE {};iET.. 23 ‘~a:=*;saa%sA
RJAT fl§..5~?§;2fi92*E%QQK

§V:%?zxA xggng Affififfififi?

=.H?;3s%=::::;a, smug’

$LEC?R&&IC§T?fi?§$

. . . R§$?§?§§£§§’§*

wax? zsgwrmaz mags §§m::=:5 $3 Qiiksii ma
,_’ “‘_-$52,232:EATEE. §.§,¢2§$8 vwx ?a§a’E§§iU§E–E Eaasgg as ?HE
z ak$§§R% ay E§&’BLE PK&.EfiE&¥ sagas, agxaaaons IR

$2-3::.?E*§*z?m:§ :a:s.,§§,z’2a§§ mg ‘§’%§E§¥.EE’*x”‘ 253% swag $3′

S’?}?i’? ‘E*HE §?$§fis3?I§§§ $5?’ $’§§TfiQ¥§£?€’? 3&3 EESREE E%.$.E’E’fI’E’T3Z7{§§§

saI~

gtzasa far an interim Grdar ma %.E..38’i.G.
fiettitaierz atanm fiiswfiefi at’ accerdingly.
‘$53.5…

38 mm”; .§§§a§ ac Efifiu 39% agfifizmfiz was $399 +5.: gzfigzxta .5 .339; :2: £:5t_:2§_ Ma…L.__g,3§; §:.§§;.: ;