Church Of Immaculate Conception vs Mrs Margaret Rose Lobo on 18 August, 2008

- -- - --I, .-V} ----------------.-n --v---«---- ...-sun: vs ~=nru\I1r\l.ru\r| ruun uvulu vr luuwlnlnlsn HIV?! EUUKI or IKARNAIAIVI HZGH COUR1

Zfi IfiE.HIGH CORE? 9? EHRHATEKH 3T BANGfiLORE 7 

nazza EH15 mas 2§"'aAr aF'AUGusr 2flfi8__ f U.*

325933
THE HuN'BLE.MR.JUSTICE 5"E part;   f x
aw. Ha . 3695/2093  " J

BETWEEN

EHURCH or IHHEEULRTEA

uawczprznm op uHwAV«'_

HAHGRLORE, A RELIGIOUS' V '%

nan camaxwgaas IHSTITUTIOH g

5°: ITS Pnaxsfi PRIEST;    3
ADMINISTRATOE3RE¥,F:§ANDREW.LEEI3

Afififl AEQflTV55"VE3A3 W  k 'C ,3

Sffi Bfifllflubfifils ' TL

EEO mama CHUECH~."_ . *~w*

re:.=s.:~:e3Auo:r._E"'V!',_--.    _ --  PETITIONER

 «jEy sr§"fi V x$iHuA, Anv.,)

_._._...--..u.- 1

,'.mrs'MA3shB£T RDSE LGEO
  
".*iKo~n*s JGSEPH LDEO
'AREA MU;1--i7--11?5-20, POHPET
'£HAQE'AaaRTMENTs. LAD?'HILL
UR3A;aHANGALDRE ... RESPONDENT

3.9. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 Ann 227
._o.1r ma: ccnswxwuwzau ow mum pnnnnc; -re QUASH -an-rs

i7~,QRnER nT.10.?.20o7, PASSED on TWO PRELIMINARY
‘._ 2133333 FRAMED BY THE TRIAL COURT ON 28.2.2006 IN
“=..__3:3.s.m.64.5 01? 2063 on *r’§m FILE 0? I ADDITIONAL

‘CIVIL JUDGE £JR.DN} MANGALORE, IN ANHEKURE-A.

THIS PETITION COINS ON FQR PRELIMINARY
HEARING THIS BAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ “”‘ “”‘ f.’ ””'”I -r*IIrI-urn I luv: I \-\JIlI\l \.lI” I\r’|l\l1l”|I.l-|l\.I’| |”H\JFl I.-LIIJKI Ur NRKIVAIAKA H56″ CUUKI OF

in

necessary agplication before the trial Ccurt for
raviaw:i.ng.a’a1odificat:ic:3 of the arder, if
advised cu: need arisas farthwith. All

ccntentiqns urged in the writ pef:;i£i0nA_é1;e.;«iT¢ft

open. Qrcfiered accordingly.

cp*