Gujarat High Court High Court

Collector vs Bhatt on 21 April, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Collector vs Bhatt on 21 April, 2010
Author: M.R. Shah,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CA/3623/2010	 2/ 2	JUDGMENT 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION - FOR BRINGING HEIRS No. 3623 of 2010
 

In


 

SECOND
APPEAL (STAMP NUMBER) No. 194 of 2009
 

 
For
Approval and Signature:  
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
 
=========================================================

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

1
		
		 
			 

Whether
			Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

2
		
		 
			 

To be
			referred to the Reporter or not ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

3
		
		 
			 

Whether
			their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

4
		
		 
			 

Whether
			this case involves a substantial question of law as to the
			interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order
			made thereunder ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

5
		
		 
			 

Whether
			it is to be  circulated to the civil judge ?
		
	

 

=========================================================

 

COLLECTOR
& 1 - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

BHATT
KALPESHBHAI MAHENDRABHAI & 10 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
NIRAJ SONI ASST.GVERNMENT PLEADER
for
Petitioner(s) : 1 - 2. 
MR UI VYAS for Respondent(s) : 1 - 4,6 -
8. 
None for Respondent(s) : 5, 5.2.1,9 -
11. 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 21/04/2010 

 

 
ORAL
JUDGMENT

RULE.

Mr.U.I. Vyas, learned advocate waivers the service of notice of rule
on behalf of the contesting respondent Nos.1 to 4 and 6 to 8.

With
the consent of the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the
respective parties, present application is taken up for final
hearing today.

Present
application has been preferred by the applicants -original
defendants permitting them to bring the heir and representative of
the respondent No.5 deceased Bhatt Bhupendrabhai Bhagwatiprasad
on the record of Civil
Application No. 8110 of 2009 as well as Second
Appeal (Stamp) No.194 of 2009.

Having
heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective
parties and the application is not seriously opposed by Mr.Vyas,
learned advocate appearing on behalf of the proposed heir and legal
representative of the respondent No.5, the application is allowed
and the applicants are permitted to bring the heir of respondent
No.5 deceased Bhatt Bhupendrabhai Bhagwatiprasad on the record
of the Civil
Application No. 8110 of 2009 and Second
Appeal (Stamp) No.194 of 2009, as mentioned in the cause
title of the present application, as respondent No.5/1. Registry to
amend the cause title of the Civil
Application No. 8110 of 2009 and Second
Appeal (Stamp) No.194 of 2009 accordingly. Rule is made
absolute to the aforesaid extent. In
the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as
to costs.

[M.R.

SHAH, J.]

rafik

   

Top