JUDGMENT
1. These three appeals are preferred by the Revenue against the order made by the Tribunal for the asst. yrs. 1993-94, 1994-95 and 1995-96 raising identical contentions.
2. The Tribunal disposed of these appeals following its earlier decisions in respect of asst. yrs. 1991-92 and 1992-93. In respect of these earlier years, two appeals were filed being ITA 447 of 2003 and ITA 444 of 2003 and a Division Bench of this Court hearing the appeals, disposed of the same by a detailed judgment against the Revenue. Similar question is raised here and; therefore, these appeals are covered by the judgment of the Division Bench in ITA 447 of
2003 and ITA 444 of 2003. We are not inclined to take a different view.
According to the counsel for the Revenue, in the instant case, IT Ref. 193 of
1995 is not required to be followed. This very contention was also considered by
the earlier Division Bench. In view of the decision of the Division Bench in the
aforesaid two appeals, we are of the view that no substantial question of law
arises. According to the learned counsel for the Revenue, the matter is required
to be reconsidered by a larger Bench of this Court, inasmuch as in some other
cases, it is alleged that, involving similar question this Court has admitted the
appeals for hearing. We are not in agreement with the same. Merely because
the question is referred and admitted, it does not become a fit case for reference
to a larger Bench. In any event, a Division Bench in the case of this very
assessed for the earlier years has come to a conclusion against the Revenue on
the questions proposed. We see no reason to depart there from for subsequent
years. The appeals are dismissed.