Posted On by &filed under Gujarat High Court, High Court.


Gujarat High Court
Commissioner vs Unknown on 22 March, 2011
Author: Akil Kureshi,&Nbsp;Ms Gokani,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

TAXAP/2321/2009	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

TAX
APPEAL No. 2321 of
2009 
=========================================================

 

COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME TAX-I - Appellant(s)
 

Versus
 

SUBHLAXMI
DEVELOPERS - Opponent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
MANISH BHATT, Sr. Advocate,MRS MAUNA M BHATT
for
Appellant(s) : 1, 
None for Opponent(s) :
1, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MS JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI
		
	

 

Date
: 22/03/2011 

 

ORAL
ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)

1. This
tax appeal is ADMITTED
for considering the following substantial questions of law:

“[A] Whether, on the
facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in
law in allowing deduction u/s.80IB(10) r.w.s. 80IB(1) to the assessee
when the approval by the local authority as well as completion
certificate was not granted to the assessee but to the landowner and
the rights and the obligations under the said approval were not
transferable, and when the transfer of dwelling units in favour of
the end-users was made by the landowner and not by the assessee?

[B] Whether,
on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was
right in law in allowing deduction u/s.80IB(10) r.w.s. 80IB(1) to
the assessee on profit derived from sale of unutilized FSI not being
the element of profits derived from the business activity of
development and construction of the housing project relating to the
sale of tenements?”

2. To
be heard with TAX APPEAL NO.546 OF 2008
and connected appeals.

(AKIL
KURESHI,J.)

(S.G.

GOKANI,J.)

Umesh/

   

Top


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

8 queries in 0.256 seconds.