Gujarat High Court High Court

=====================================================Commissioner vs Unknown on 26 August, 2010

Gujarat High Court
=====================================================Commissioner vs Unknown on 26 August, 2010
Author: D.A.Mehta,&Nbsp;Honourable Ms.Justice H.N.Devani,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

TAXAP/202/2005	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

TAX
APPEAL No. 202 of 2005
 

WITH
 

TAX
APPEAL No. 204 of 2005
 

 
 
=====================================================COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME TAX - Appellant(s)
 

Versus
 

REPROPACK
PVT. LTD. - Opponent(s)
 

===================================================== 
Appearance
: 
MR MANISH R BHATT for
Appellant(s) : 1, 
None for Opponent(s) :
1, 
====================================================
 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
			 

 

			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 10/10/2005 

 

COMMON
ORDER 

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA)

1 The
following common question has been proposed in both these appeals :

?SWhether
the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in holding that
capital gain chargeable to tax u/s. 46(2) will also be eligible for
grant of benefit envisaged in section 47(v) of the Act ???

2 Mr.M.R.Bhatt,
learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the
appellant-revenue has submitted that Tribunal has followed its
decision dated 19/12/2002 in case of Alkapuri Investment (P) Ltd.
against which the appellant revenue had carried the matter by
way of Appeal before this Court, and by order dated 21/03/2005 made
in Tax Appeal No.516 of 2003 this Court has rejected identical
question proposed being question No.4 in the said appeal. Again in
case of A.C.I.T. V/s.Alkapuri Investment (P) Ltd. by order dated
4/7/2005 in Tax Appeal No.423 of 2004 this Court has rejected
identical question and dismissed the appeal.

3 In
the circumstances, for the reasons stated in order dated 21/03/2005
and 4/7/2005 in case of Alkapuri Investment (P) Ltd. (supra)
these appeals are dismissed.

(D.A.Mehta,
J) (H.N.Devani, J)

m.m.bhatt

   

Top