IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 7607 of 2009(U)
1. CORPORATE MANAGER,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. STATE OF KERALA,
... Respondent
2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION,
3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,
4. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATION OFFICER,
5. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL,
For Petitioner :SRI.J.JULIAN XAVIER
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.N.RAVINDRAN
Dated :30/03/2009
O R D E R
P.N.Ravindran, J.
==================
W.P.(C) No.7607 of 2009
=====================
Dated this the 30th day of March, 2009.
JUDGMENT
Heard Sri. Firoz K.Robin, the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner and Sri. A.J.Varghese, the learned Government Pleader
appearing for the respondents.
2. The petitioner is the Corporate Manager of the educational
institutions established and administered by the Carmelite Congregation
of Sisters. Ext.P1 staff fixation order in respect of St. John the Baptist
Convent Lower Primary School, Pariyaram for the academic year 1996-97
was issued by the Assistant Educational Officer, Chalakudy on 14.7.1997.
Ext.P1 was revised by Ext.P6 order dated 15.6.1998 passed by the
Director of Public Instruction. After five years, the Joint Director of Public
Instruction reviewed Ext.P6 and passed Ext.P8 order dated 30.6.2003.
Aggrieved by Ext.P8, the petitioner moved the Government in Ext.P9
revision petition under Rule 12F of Chapter XXIII of the Kerala Education
Rules and thereafter filed W.P.(C) No.7615 of 2008 in this Court. By
Ext.P11 judgment delivered on 6.3.2008, this Court directed the
WP(C)7607/09 -: 2 :-
Government to pass orders on Ext.P9 revision petition within two months
from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. The Government
thereafter passed Ext.P12 order dated 3.9.2008 upholding Ext.P8. The
petitioner challenges Ext.P12 mainly on the ground that before it was
passed, the petitioner was not put on notice or heard. The learned
Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted on
instructions that before the Ext.P12 order was passed, the petitioner was
not put on notice or heard for the reason that there was no such request
in Ext.P9.
3. Ext.P9 is a statutory revision filed by the Manager before the
Government under Rule 12F of Chapter XXIII of the Kerala Education
Rules. The dispute relates to the staff fixation order for the academic
year 1997-1998. The staff fixation order was revised five years later by
Ext.P8 order dated 30.6.2003 passed by the Director of Public
Instruction. Since the order was revised nearly five years after the
academic year came to an end I am of the opinion that the Government
ought to have heard the petitioner before passing Ext.P12 order. I
accordingly quash Ext.P12 and direct the Government to reconsider
Ext.P9 revision petition filed by the petitioner and pass orders thereon
after affording the petitioner a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
Final orders in the matter shall be passed within four months from the
date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall
in order to enable the Secretary to Government to pass orders in the
WP(C)7607/09 -: 3 :-
matter, produce before the Secretary to Government, General Education
Department a copy of this Writ Petition along with a certified copy of this
judgment.
P.N.Ravindran,
Judge.
ess