Corporation Bank vs M/S Karnataka Leasing & … on 28 July, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT 

DATED THIS THE 28'1"" DAY OF IULY:-,1%L:fi0IDI*O:I[%{I  

BEFORID  A

THE HON'BLE MR. }Us'IjICI: HIIIJ, I\:AGAIyIhOHI»II\i  

 

_._._.___.

CA.No.6[1998 I1§f {:'(_)P_.No;43/VVA9§2 

BETWEEN:

CORPORATIONBANK   '  '
MILL CORNER  fa 
SAMPIGE R._O'AD;j"  . " ._
sEsHADR:tPU_e;AM;"-v--. >   IL
BANCA.L0R£g55II92o   '-
BY ITS MANAGER"  "

..APPLICANT
(By srI.]}&I-Lg§1;DIéDLI§iA,G, ;}&DV.,)

' ' 1.__. M/S_ .KI¢IR1§TATAKA LEASING 8: COMMERCIAL

C'ORP~ORA*I'ION LIMITED (UNDER LIQUIDATION)
REPRESENTED BY THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR

~.. "  SADAN D & F WING, 41'" FLOO§{,
 * KORAMANGALA,
 BANGALORE560 034.

2. SHRI M.P.PRABHU
'SHASHIPRABHA'

g.



405, I BLOCK, RAIAIINAGAR
BANGALORE--56O 010.
[DELETED V/O D"E'.26.5.2OOS]

3. SHRI MLGOPALA SHE I I Y
S/O M.LACI-IAIAH
NO} 25, A, I BLOCK, 10"' MAIN

IAYANAGAR, BANCALORE560 01 1. 

[DELETED V/O DT.26.5.2005]  _

4. SHR1 A_N.VARADARAnJL"UE:'_"E'

S/O A.V.NAN]UNDA SHEITY

NO.4, 4TH CROSS, MALLES'\j2.rAEi_A1v;,.O  ~ E 

BANGALORE.

[DELETED V/O DT.26.5.2005]_  R E

5.  D 

DIRECf1fC")R;w.1yI}\r§\QAIJESHDOBEEDEAES  V

[DEEETEDV/VO~"1>TS_   3

RESPONDENTS

(By Sri K.S_4i\2L¢gHE®EV;ER*3£ VJAYARAM, ADVS.)

« .APPu’CAT1ON ETLED UNDER SECTION 446 AND 537

[THEE ‘COMPANIES ACT READ WITH RULE 9 OF THE
_ COMRAREES.S’V-(COURT) RULES, 1959 PRAYING TO PERMIT THE
APPLICANT 7T0 PROCEED AGAINST THE RESPONDENT H\I

C’;’A.NO.784795 FOR THE RECOVERY OF THE SUIT CLAIM OF

E’ RS.2;28;78,292.52 PS. WITH INTEREST AND ETC.

This application Coming On for Orders this day, the Court

1T1Ede the fofiowingg

7 …-‘\i””

Qfiflfifi

Learned counsel for the applicant submits-*tI:’1atV

in the application had become ifif}uCtuQu$ i;n_ VieW the

settlement of the controversy betv,fee’11 the_.”.pa.r’ties.

submission of learned counsel x4fe_r the app-3i_cV:a115t placed on

record. Accordingly, the.xéppA1ieati2Q’1j.. rejected.