High Court Karnataka High Court

D M Murugendraiah vs The Joint Registrar Of … on 18 November, 2010

Karnataka High Court
D M Murugendraiah vs The Joint Registrar Of … on 18 November, 2010
Author: V.Jagannathan


3: Tim men comm’ or KARKi’sTAI{A AT ;

BATED ms THE mm my cm KQVEIv;I.:B$_E%. O, ” 1

BEFORE T %
um HGEPBLE am. wanes V;J§;{“}Ah¥1§A’§’f§{§§i~I

WRIT yamxcrz R0. 159:5.s% <i:z? {$53553

BETWEEN

1 DMHUR!Z}?;'rEKDRA1AH'u _
azcs. 19.31." ssmasmvmaa *
AGED % %
R;o.Dm13_mE % €3~E

§£§.VA1N¥{}ERE 1::s;es'r,

(By Sri: 3 snivg

ARE:

a——-……..u.

" ' "    QF SG-GFERATIVE

seawrwfi % 

_Bfi;.Pi(“iAi;fiEéE”‘I?E’éCvI{)E

a drag cagazsmn CADRE ccmwaa
_1.:.;£.c. Biamc LILEETED
_ “«.{Z’.I{IfI’RADURGuA REF 8′! yrs smasmflvj

” .*.::’:iE EIAKAGEG nmma
2.3.0. BANK LEa{1’rE3:r
” GBHWURQA,

mmm SECRETARY
€3.C3.A CHI’I’RADUR@L E.O.C.
$A..?¥X LTEE

CKYFRABURGA. g. . RESPSHEEITIS.

FETIFIQNER.

[By Sri. JA%DEE$H HUNEDARGI, GA FGIR R-I
R-2 TG 4 ARE SEFfVE}.”.¥ & UNREFRE$EI*3″TEI}}

mm PETITION rs FILED mmm A.seTIc:LEa_I€~-._ THE” .PE’%ffFI02~:m” as
EARLER TEL FINAL DISPQQAL GETHE PENDIHG
EEFORE THE KARN;e.TAKA_.–«–_A.PPEL1.ATE ‘-*’1″.R£’.5UmaL,
BAHGALGRE BEAWG _§C3.§9;3« 0F 21306 AND
ALTERNAHVELY, IJIREC? ~ V’K£xRW;_1’AEA APPELLATE
TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE TO”£3CI§3IBER “3;’I5I_E_ APPLIGATIGH
9? THE FETYPIGEER F022′ ‘t;§PaLu*r~..;;:~.F sway; Aymn Arm

‘1’GPASS%&SC;3NEW3)j’ORDER.~»w*” _

FOR Pasmmmxv
H:EAma«:3 m 3*’-rmeur, ‘rH;s DAY’ THE (mum mung THE
mmowmczw A = 3 ‘

% b¢£ 1:

_ the patitinnm submim that

is likely m be diagnosed of at the

KAT and ma matxte.-r is pcxstsd ta

V7??”.1:.m,2é2%:i and zkmmm, this pet-men be diapmeci sf

to the KAT ta dispeas at’ the apw}; at

V[ saarléssn

2. In ‘Kw éf the abevc submiasimn made, KPLT is

d?rec1:ed to djspme of tlw aypeal an maritaa gt: 1.1.9:

2/

at