High Court Karnataka High Court

D M Vijaya Kumar vs The Regional Manager on 16 December, 2010

Karnataka High Court
D M Vijaya Kumar vs The Regional Manager on 16 December, 2010
Author: Lok Adalath
HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BANGALORE
BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT " 

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT  

DATED THIS THE I631" DAY OE.DECEMf$'E'R,V'2IO'.iQ  A 

CONCILIATORS   

HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.S';KEPI/II5A:}VTAIA"' 
SRI. BASAVARAJ I:AR,E_I:>DY_, MEMBER'

Miscellaneous FiresAp§3e2iI,iN¢;SflzzI8,'.200S [MV]
LO}: ACia.Iaf  328 /2  "

BETWEEN:    

D.M.VIJAYA KUMAR,'   .. 

25     '-

S/O MUNISWA1VIA?PPA,"'~I,v   %

R/AT I*~IO.=:2'SS. LAYOUT,

HEBBAL AGRIC1ILTURE_ FORM PO,
M.DASAR}*IHALLI,._BANGALORE -- 24  APPELLANT

[BY  A ADV. FOR

1. A'I'I~IE _REO~IONAL MANfOER
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
REGIONAL OFFICE, SHUBHARAM COMPLEX.

 V.  M..,G.ROAD, BANGALORE W I

' I   2;, NEALAMURUOAN,

fS/O.NATESHAN, MAJOR,
N083, 13"' MAIN ROAD,
KALASIPALYAM EXTENSION,



(J

BANGALORE W 560 002.  RESPONDENTS

{BY SRi.GANGAI)HAR SANOOLLI m ADV. ~
NOTICE TO Rm2 DISPENSED WITH ” I
V/O DATED 25.08.10)

THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER sE”ci*IO1e ._1′”?3{-1′)-{OF
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AwAI::D ..DA’i’ED 29. I2′::>,0*eI7

PASSED IN MVC NO.158/2006 ON’fI’HE FI’LE3.”_IO:F’ ‘Xvi’-,
ADDITIONAL JUDGE, Ix/II«:MI–::I3I2.._ MAC-T, BANGALORE CI’I’Y,=. ‘

SCCHM 14, PARTLY AI.LOWING—,T’i–:1E CLAIM I*~PI:TI’*IfION FOR
COMPENSATION AND SEEKING _V ENHANCEMENT OF

THIS APPEAL CONCILIATION
BEFORE LOK A;DALAT”FiFfrER_’B”EIN’G’V REFERRED VIDE
ORDER DATE_D. ¥.31,_O8.i20.10[f-.. FOLLOWING
CONCILIATIQN _ I:3__PASSED .,

…. ORDER
‘i5hi:~: °p.ei’s’onaI injury. The Tribunal

by its awarded compensation Of

?1,14ii,Ai00/~ vtrith .iI__1__t_eI’est at 6% p.a. from the date of the

»p:e’titj.VOn_ti1l’re’a1isatiOn.

A ~. -_,QIAVAf£fe_rtI=IegOtiatiOII before the Adalath, the learned

COuIiS€1V..’*f;()I’V the respective parties have agreed to settie

V’ “.f_’theA”e1aim in full and final settlement for a sum Of

?’6}0,000 with interest at 6% p.a. OV€1′ and above the

compensation awarded by the tribunal. Accordingly,

they have filed joint memo duty signed by the respke-eti.Ve
csouiisei and the parties.

-,,.. Q

3. In View of the settlég

V _
memo filed. office is directed
accordingly. V t t A t

4. The first respondent}.:in’stirerV2deposit the
enhanced eompensadoii as
indicated above the date of
receipt of of;:’the_ which, the said
amount vp.a. from the date of
default,

of ?°60,000/– with interest

shai1§’be..releasedin favour of the appellant on being

V ideipoz-,1’t:ed. bif’t.he insurer.

W”:

Judge

rs

Uifx 2 *
[arrived at__aIi.d ‘t.he_join’t._ ”