High Court Kerala High Court

D.P.Madhusudhana Bhatt vs Travancore Devaswom Board on 7 September, 2007

Kerala High Court
D.P.Madhusudhana Bhatt vs Travancore Devaswom Board on 7 September, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 14237 of 2007(T)


1. D.P.MADHUSUDHANA BHATT,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.G.HARIHARAN

                For Respondent  :SRI.D.SREEKUMAR, SC, TDB

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI

 Dated :07/09/2007

 O R D E R
                                     V. GIRI , J
                         ==========================
                           W.P.(C) NO. 14237 OF 2007
                         ==========================
                    Dated this the 7th day of September, 2007.

                                    JUDGMENT

The petitioner is working as Melshanthi in the Thonikavu Devaswom

under the Paravur Sub Group of the Travancore Devaswom Board. According to

him, he has completed 23 years of service under various temples under the

Devaswom Board from 20.03.1999. He is currently drawing total emoluments to

the tune of Rs. 5,146/-. His grievance is that other service benefits have not

been made available. Highlighting this, he has preferred Ext.P3 before the

Commissioner of Devaswom. In my opinion, the matter actually requires

attention of the Board itself.

2. In the circumstances, Ext.P3 will be forwarded by the 2nd respondent

to the 1st respondent within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a

copy of this judgment. On receipt of the same, the 1st respondent shall consider

and take appropriate decision in determining whether the service benefits due to

the petitioners have actually been made available. If it is found that any other

benefits are due to him, proper action will be taken to disburse the same to him

within a period of three months thereafter.

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

V. GIRI, JUDGE.

rv