IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE.-.__
DATED THIS THE 16" DAY OF DECEMBER, 2010'ff"j<--..:"'II.
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.VEh!UGOPAI'IH"¢'O;Ié/'DEA V
WRIT PETITION NO.38198/2€3«1O(7.GiV§Ev--C--P6i
BETWEEN:
D.S. Prakash, S/O Shamanna,
Aged 61 years 7'
R/a Doddathogur Viflage, _
Begur Hobli, Bangalore South Tai'u.I<. "..V:1P_E'TITIONER
(By Sri av. Mafia ReLdd*g...1'Adv=.) if
AND: 'E ' H 2 'E
1. GovindappEa',%"S/Oaiaate
Aged about 7'{_) years," * ' -
R/a Doddathogur Village; "
Be-gu r Hobll, i3ara~g}4a|Iore"So[I.t'h
2. Muniyappa, ES/0 |a'te._V_VDOddamuniyappa,
Ag'é'd.abO:It'I8Q._.yearS, """
R/0. SIcfdapura'VII|_a'g._g,
vartmn-.I.HToI:I%.,I.ganTgaTIIore South Taiuk. ;RESPONDENTS
Sri 'I'~I.S;T'vaka*'gi!.i;;_rV;--;I'3'an, Adv.)
'.VTHIS"vIRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
"':2f/--.O'F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE
gORDER DATED 30.10.10 PASSED ON I.A. 4 VIDE ANNEXURE--U
"-I..REJEECTfIENC..E'TO FRAME THE PROPOSED ISSUE NO.2
'_O.S'.~NO.2062/07 ON THE FILE OF ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (SR. DN.),
BANG.A_I-ORE RURAL DIST. ETC. ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY--LTHE
COURT MADE THE FOE_LOWING:--
ORDER
By an order dated 24.9.10 pass.ed~inA 1′
W.P. 6057/10, the Trial Court was directed A'(:’f:iS§’§'(3–F5_RAE’:
before the end of 2011. Thereafte_r}”~»t_he deferiadalrit “a.pp’eaar:s to R’ V
have indulged in filing series of—–Tdppl’i’c.ations;w… such
aPDlicat§on is I.A.4 filed under raise additional
issues. The Trial Court_ has allowed the
application in part issue No.1 with
regard to Iirnitatiionf:”i1:t:s:A_ However, the second
proposed issue ,»t’oR.hd’efen’dant acquiring the right by
prescription, = the defendant has filed
this writ peitition.
V “learned counsel on both sides and perused
R a,.,,t¢h.e writ petition, papers.
Keeping in view the averments at para 28 of the
‘VV.”_’-tan-itten”..statement, the proposed additional issue No.2 ought to
is
gs
have been raised by the Triai Court. In not raising the–___said
issue, there is irrationaiity.
In the resuit, the impugned order to the ”
raising the said issue, stands modified.
The Triai Court is directed to raids’
additional issue, try and disposeiiofithe shoit, the ”
aforesaid order.
VvntpefifionsfiandsaHowedaE;dfifing&;L*.
JUDGE
sac*