Dalit Atyachar Virodh Samiti vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 30 September, 2010

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

                 CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.16503 of 2010

                 ==============================================
                 DALIT ATYACHAR VIRODH SAMITI THROUGH MANGLI
                 MOSOMAT W/O- LATE MOHAN MUKHIA THE
                 CONVENER OF THE SAMITI, RESIDENT OF HARTALI
                 CHAWK, BAILY ROAD, BEHIND INDRA BHAWAN,
                 BAILY ROAD HALD, P.S. -SHASTRI NAGAR, PATNA
                                                             - Petitioner(s)
                                          Versus
           1.    THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY,
                 NEW SECRETARIAT, PATNA
           2.    MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF PATNA THROUGH
                 MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, PMC MAURYA LOK
                 COMPLEX., PATNA.
           3.    COMMISSIONER PATNA DIVISION, PATNA.
           4.    THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PATNA DISTRICT.
           5.    SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATNA DISTRICT
                                                          - Respondent(s)
                 ==============================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner : Mr. AVANINDRA KR.JHA, ADVOCATE
                 For the Respondents : Mr. PRABHAKAR TEKRIWAL, GA-1
                 For the P.M.C.      : Mr.BISHWA BIBHUTI KUMAR SINGH,
                                                             ADVOCATE
                 ==============================================

                 CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                                and
                      HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN

                 ORAL ORDER

(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

2 30.09.2010 Heard the learned advocates.

The petitioner Dalit Atyachar Virodh Samiti has

preferred this petition in public interest for a direction
2

that any encroachment made on a public land by a person

of Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe shall not be

removed.

At first, it may be noted that the petitioner

Samiti has no legal existence. A petition by such non-

existent Samiti is not maintainable. Second, the

presumptive omnibus relief prayed for cannot be granted.

.

The petition is dismissed in limine.

( R.M. Doshit, CJ.)

(Jyoti Saran, J.)

Bibhash