High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Daljit Singh vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 15 April, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Daljit Singh vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 15 April, 2009
        IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                        CHANDIGARH




                                  Criminal Misc M- 9657 of 2009

                                  Date of decision: 15.4.2009


Daljit Singh                                        ...Petitioner

                             Versus

State of Haryana and ors                            ...Respondents


Present:       Mr Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate for the petitioner.



S.S.SARON, J.

This petition under Section 482 CrPC has been filed for

directing respondents-2 and 3 to take action against respondents-4 to 6 as

they have cheated the petitioner and his brother – Jasbir Singh. Besides,

they have misappropriated the money and lodged false FIR against the

brother of the petitioner.

After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing

the record, it may be noticed that the primary grievances of the petitioner is

for registration of a FIR. In this regard, it may be noticed that the Supreme

Court in Aleque Padamsee and others v. Union of India and others, (2007) 6

SCC 171 (SC) observed that the correct position in law is that the Police

officials are to register a FIR whenever the facts brought to the notice show

that cognizable offence has been made out. In case the Police officials

failed to do so, the modalities to be adopted are set out in Section 190 read

with Section 200 Cr.P.C. Therefore, if a person is aggrieved by the inaction
Cr Misc M-9657 of 2009 2

of the Police officials in registering the FIR, the modalities contained in

Section 190 read with Section 200 Cr.P.C are to be adopted and followed.

In Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P. and others, 2008 (1) RCR (Cr.)

392 (SC) it was observed by the Supreme Court that if a person has a

grievance that the police station is not registering his FIR under Section 154

Cr.P.C., then he can approach the Superintendent of Police under Section

154(3) Cr.P.C. by an application in writing. Even if that does not lead to

any satisfactory result in the sense that either the FIR is not registered or

even after registering it no proper investigation is held, it is open to the

aggrieved person to file such application under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C.

before the learned Magistrate concerned. If such an application under

Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. is filed before the Magistrate, the Magistrate can

direct the FIR to be registered and can also direct proper investigation to be

made in a case where, according to the aggrieved person, no proper

investigation was made. However, the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

for directing the registration of a FIR is to be done only in some rare and

some exceptional cases.

In the present case, the petitioner has his remedy of

approaching the Magistrate in case there is any inaction on the part of the

Police in not registering the FIR. The present is not a case which would

warrant the issuance of directions by this Court for registration of a FIR.

In the circumstances, the petitioner if so advised, may avail his

other remedies as available to him in accordance with law. The criminal

miscellaneous petition is accordingly disposed of.




15.4.2009.                                           ( S.S.SARON )
ASR                                                       Judge