High Court Kerala High Court

Damiyan Louis vs State Of Kerala on 4 August, 2009

Kerala High Court
Damiyan Louis vs State Of Kerala on 4 August, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 22022 of 2009(W)


1. DAMIYAN LOUIS, SACRED HEART HOUSE,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. SIRIL MORAYEES, ST. JACOB HOUSE,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY
                       ...       Respondent

2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR,

3. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, RESURVEY

4. TAHSILDAR, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK,

5. KOTTUKAL GRAMA PANCHAYATH,

6. SECRETARY, KOPTTUKAL GRAMA

7. VILLAGE OFFICER, KOTTUKAL VILLAGE

8. SHAJI THOMAS, KAKKANADU LANE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE(PERUMPALLIKUTTIYIL)

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI

 Dated :04/08/2009

 O R D E R
                       V.GIRI, J.
         ----------------------------------------
               W.P.(C).No.22022 of 2009
         ----------------------------------------
         Dated this the 4th day of August, 2009.


                      JUDGMENT

The petitioners are aggrieved by Ext.P7

building permit granted in favour of the 8th

respondent. They sought for revocation of the

permit granted by moving an application before the

original authority. The said application has been

rejected under Ext.P12, passed after hearing the

petitioners as also the 8th respondent.

2. The petitioners have also moved the

District Collector, Thiruvananthapuram, seeking to

cancel the mutation, which according to them, has

been effected at the instance of the 8th respondent.

This writ petition has been filed challenging Exts.P7

and P12 and also praying for a direction that Ext.P13

representation filed before the District Collector

shall be looked into.

W.P.(C).No.22022 of 2009

:: 2 ::

3. I am not inclined to consider the

petitioners’ contention on merits, since the

petitioner have an efficacious alternate remedy.

4. Accordingly, if the petitioners file an

appeal challenging Ext.P7 within three weeks from

today before the appellate tribunal, then the

Tribunal shall consider the said appeal, as presented

in time and proceed to pass appropriate orders, after

hearing both the parties, within three months

thereafter. The petitioners may challenge the

correctness of Ext.P12 also in the said appeal.

5. In the meanwhile, the District Collector

the 3rd respondent shall look into Ext.P13 and take

an appropriate decision thereon within two months

from the date of production of a copy of this

judgment, along with a copy of the writ petition. If

the District Collector feels that any subordinate

officer to him has to pass orders on Ext.P13, then it

is open to the District Collector to forward Ext.P13

W.P.(C).No.22022 of 2009

:: 3 ::

to such subordinate authority. In such an event, a

decision on Ext.P13 shall be taken within three

months from the date of production of a copy of this

judgment.

Writ petitions are disposed of as above.

Sd/-

(V.GIRI)
JUDGE
sk/
//true copy//

P.S. to Judge