IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MFA.No. 63 of 2008()
1. DANA VAMADEVAN DAS, `DANA',
... Petitioner
Vs
1. SUNIL ANIRUDHAN, S/O.ANIRUDHAN,
... Respondent
2. LAILA DAS, W/O.VAMADEVAN DAS,
For Petitioner :SRI.GRASHIOUS KURIAKOSE
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice J.B.KOSHY
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.N.RAVINDRAN
Dated :29/05/2008
O R D E R
J.B.Koshy & P.N.Ravindran, JJ.
=====================
M.F.A.No.63 of 2008
=====================
Dated this the 29th day of May, 2008.
JUDGMENT
Koshy,J.
The respondent – husband filed an application for custody of
the child. The interim custody was given to the father. But at
the time of hearing, since the parties were abroad, the O.P. was
closed. It is the case of the appellant mother that as per the
interim order, custody of the child is with the father and her claim
has to be considered. But we note that in paragraph 5 of the
order, it is observed as follows:
“5. The parties will be at liberty to reopen the
case as and when they arrive at station, or when the
child is brought to station. No order as to costs.”
In the circumstances, we are of the view that no decision is taken
against the petitioner and the petitioner can file an application for
permanent custody of the child before the Family Court and if
MFA 63/08 -: 2 :-
such an application is filed, it should be disposed of as
expeditiously as possible untrammelled by the observations in the
interim order and the final order.
The appeal is disposed of as above.
J.B.Koshy,
Judge.
P.N.Ravindran,
Judge.
ess 29/5