BETWEEN: V
IN THE HIGH ccaum’ 09* ~
cniecurr BENCH AT DHAf§’_SI§ff$:DV A’ A
DATEI) THIS THE 7TH m;YA%C;§* I’-{O¥’E1&i§§§E}§..;2:'(§(}_8V’:’
THE H0N’BLE MR;JijsmcE”i+I.:}.§eAiv:EsH
M:scE:,LANEc:::”s No. V14-$39/2007
Da11gi1′;.-‘rI4aI’.f_S()<'i;"',3'–.._ %
Major, i'.;__ 3 -A
S / :3' 'fiohainméiiii 'Da:1gi_. _
MLirudc$hu*:–r:..T*q. ' ~
Bhai;kal._ ' —
(By Sr;i;’;’:’s5hrip;3.t£ and
” ; ” Sri.K.B}:1at, vAdvs.(abseI1t)
_Age_€;28 yfiars,
‘ ft: Manjunatha Naik,
” _ E-“3/0 Manki Paiki Gnladaiceri,
Hoxznavai’.
The Bivisional Manager,
National insurarice ($0., Ltd,
Divifiionai Office,
Udupi.
… . .Appella3:1t
. .Responder:ts
This appeal is filed under section :_tf’.3’€; ‘(Vv1’.j__j’§:§ij:V’lia.4V
Act, against the judgtnent and award damd V1.5;’1Cr.
passed in MVC 910.193/2002 on the 1:a1ei%%¢fV Giéril. wage
(Sr.};)£1.} & Member, Additi0na}.”M;%.«CT;_. H9111}?-,wa.1i,.i’paart1y’j« ”
0
aikawing the clam; petitien: for A. fi::Gmpci3sa*;3;€>_n and
seeking enhancement of compexisaiion. ‘ ‘~ . «.
This appeal <:0I11i.11g'<2.f.}'L":'£"or a;:111r1is;*7si(§3?1,x'£}:4iiS' day, the
Court delivered t:i1e_fo110wi:_xf;¢g:..V_ "
Nongc: though the appeal
is calleii fiénce, the appeal stantm
cii
. . , . .. . ., Sdl'
Judge
"-~.$t1?q'v«' A