IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C) No. 25720 of 2007(J)
1. DAVID JOHN, AGED 50 YEARS,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. CORPORATE MANAGER,
... Respondent
2. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,
3. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,
For Petitioner :SRI.P.SANTHOSH (PODUVAL)
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN
Dated :23/08/2007
O R D E R
THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.
-------------------------------------------
W.P(C).No.25720 OF 2007
-------------------------------------------
Dated this the 23rd day of August, 2007
JUDGMENT
Following the issuance of Ext.P9 memo of charges, to
which, the petitioner has placed objections, the Manger of the
school, where the petitioner works, has placed him under
suspension. Obviously, this action requires the concurrence of
the statutory respondents to keep the petitioner under
suspension beyond the period of 15 days. Even if the petitioner
is aggrieved by any decision of the Deputy Director, which may
be adverse to him, he would have statutory remedies available
under the Kerala Education Rules, 1958. Under such
circumstances, without expressing anything on merits, this writ
petition is disposed of directing that the petitioner’s objections, if
any, to the order of suspension and to any request of the
Manager to continue him under suspension will also be
considered by the third respondent while considering the
question as to whether the order of suspension of the petitioner
should be permitted to continue beyond 15 days.
THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN,
Judge
kkb.