High Court Kerala High Court

Denzil D’Souza vs Kollam Corporation on 14 August, 2008

Kerala High Court
Denzil D’Souza vs Kollam Corporation on 14 August, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 20593 of 2008(B)


1. DENZIL D'SOUZA,MILLIE LODGE,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. SHIRLEY D'SOUZA,MILLIE LODGE,

                        Vs



1. KOLLAM CORPORATION,REPRESENTED BY ITS
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE SECRETARY,

3. AGNES GEORGE, KOTTAPPURAM,

4. GALLI,KOTTAPPURAM,

5. SEBASITAN GALLI,KOTTAPPURAM,

6. RAMACHANDRAN ,KOTTAPPURAM,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.B.SURESH KUMAR

                For Respondent  :SRI.VINOD.B,SC, KOLLAM CORPORATION

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :14/08/2008

 O R D E R
                     ANTONY DOMINIC, J

    -----------------------------------------------------------
                    W.P.(C).No.20593/2008
    -----------------------------------------------------------
          Dated this the 14th     day of August, 2008


                           JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed on the allegation that

respondents 3 to 6 have encroached into the property

belong to the Corporation of Kollam, the first respondent

herein. According to the petitioners, their allegation to the

above effect stands confirmed by Ext.P2 report submitted by

the Town Planning Surveyor of the corporation. It is on that

basis, they seek further action in this matter. If as stated by

the petitioners, there is an allegation of encroachment and

report in this behalf has already been submitted, it is

necessary for the Corporation to take further action in this

matter. This the Corporation shall do in accordance with law

and with notice to respondents 3 to 6.

WP(c).No.20593/08 2

2. The petitioners have a case that the report also

confirms their allegation that the Corporation has

committed trespass into their property as well.

True, Ext.P2 report suggests the case canvassed by the

learned counsel for the petitioner. This also is a matter for

the corporation to bestow its attention and do the needful in

this matte, as expeditiously as possible and at any rate

within 8 weeks from the date of production of a copy of this

judgmnent.

Writ Petition is disposed of as above.

ANTONY DOMINIC
JUDGE

vi.

WP(c).No.20593/08 3