High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Dev Chandra Mishra &Amp; Ors vs State Of Bihar on 30 June, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Dev Chandra Mishra &Amp; Ors vs State Of Bihar on 30 June, 2010
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                         Cr.Misc. No.16470 of 2008

              1. Dev Chandra Mishra, Son of Late Chitra Narayan
                 Mishra
              2. Narayani Mishra W/O Dev Chandra Mishra
              3. Abhay Kumar Mishra, Son of Dev Chandra Mishra
                      All of Village- Tatuar, P.S. Manigachchi,
                 District-Darbhanga           -- Petitioners
                                      Versus
                                  STATE OF BIHAR
                                   -----------

03 30-06-2010 When the case was called out, no one appeared on

behalf of the petitioner either to press this petition or to make a

prayer for adjournment. Yesterday (i.e. 29.06.2010) also, none

had appeared on behalf of the petitioners. However, Sri Nirbhay

Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

informant and Smt. Indu Bala Pandey, learned Addl.Public

Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State were present.

Today again Sri Nirbhay Kumar Singh, learned

counsel appearing on behalf of the informant and Smt. Indu Bala

Pandey, learned Addl.Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of

the State are present.

It has been submitted by Sri Singh, learned counsel

for the informant that the petitioners are not interested in the

present case and, as such, none has come forward.

Three petitioners, while invoking inherent

jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, have prayed for quashing of the order dated

25.2.2008 passed in Laheriasarai P.S. Case No.415 of 2006 by

the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga. By the said
order, the learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of the

offences under Sections 406.420, 506,120B/34 of the Indian

Penal Code and 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Sri Singh, learned counsel for the informant has

further informed the Court that in this case after order of

cognizance, charges have already been framed and the evidence

in the case is going on. It was submitted that four prosecution

witnesses have already been examined.

In view of the fact that the trial has already

commenced and four witnesses have already been examined,

there is no point to entertain the present case, which has

primarily been filed against the order of cognizance.

Accordingly, I do not find merit in the present

petition and the petition stands rejected.

NKS/-                              ( Rakesh Kumar, J)